Ian said:
On the local network the binding-order determines this.
What do you mean by "binding-order", Ian, and how do you configure it?
If you mean the order in which connections appear in the Connections
window of Network Connections > Advanced > Advanced Settings >
Adapters and Bindings, then I disagree. If you mean something else,
please describe it.
For the TCP/IP protocol, Windows XP looks at the route table to
determine which connection(s) can reach a destination IP address.
When more than one connection is possible, XP looks at the metrics for
the connections and uses the one with the lower metric. Even if the
metrics are equal, the binding order has no effect on LAN use in my
tests, both for pings and for accessing shared folders.
This behavior is the same for all networks. Windows XP doesn't
distinguish between LANs, WANs, etc.
Over longer distances the number of 'hops' (routing cost) for each route may
come into play.
I don't know of any way that Windows XP computes or uses the number of
'hops' to a destination. If you do, please describe it. Routing
choices are based on metrics. XP computes metrics based on connection
speeds.
--
Best Wishes,
Steve Winograd, MS-MVP (Windows Networking)
Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group
for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions
addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups.
Microsoft Most Valuable Professional Program
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com