SavePart ... a first-hand & detailed eval report

C

Chief Suspect

Recently, in a.c.f we have been apprised of the new freeware
offering by D. Guibouret who maintains a site at
www.partition-saving.com.

For the interest of regular a.c.f. participants, I provide
herewith my own first-hand evaluation of this new program.

Having an advanced XP computer with lottsa stuff installed
on it, I was just about ready to make a Ghost image anyway.
BUT ... along came SAVEPART, a freeware entry into the arena
where Ghost, TerraByte, Drive Image, and others seemed in
control. I decided to make a dramatic, stringent test of
this new program, soooo .. after having made the set of images
needed, I then balded my C: drive right down to the slick,
mirrow surface using RM /SHRY *.*. (RM is industrial strength
delete ... CAUTION ... know what you are doing!!!)

My report is as follows:

1. It is DOS only. You will need a boot disk with SavePart on it.
But, it employs a text GUI that is nearly fool-proof. At least,
it worked the very first time for me. My C: drive was FAT-32
using Win XP-sp1, and it fitted on a 4 Meg partition of my
hard drive (4,12,12,and 12 Meg parts).

2. I used the GUI default to find and choose which partition
I wished to image, and also the destination partition where I
would store the image(s), and further.. to choose the size I
wished for each of the image parts. You see, 4 gigs will not
compress to just one CD, so I chose 650MB segments .. ending
up with 4 image parts, each easily burned onto a CD-R. There
are command line parameters to use in case the user wished to
do things entirely automatically .. but, for this test I
preferred to use the GUI. As a result, I had to name each
of the four image parts by hand; I chose .IMG, .001, .002, and
..003 for extensions. All this could have been done automatically
by use of command line parameters, but I still wanted to 'watch'
the process.

3. It takes longer than Ghost or TerraByte or Drive Image.
In fact, it took about 30 minutes of actual image-making time
for the size of my C: drive. This did not include the time
required to type in the name and extension needed for each
segment as it was called for. So far, so good.

4. After gaining the images, I decided to go "Whole Hog"
with my evaluation by actually balding my hard drive, not
merely overwriting with replacement of the image. I had chosen
maximum compression, too; the author specified GZ algorithms
were used.

5. The repainting of the image(s) back onto the hard drive
partition were a sort of reverse process; the program calling
for each of the image segments as needed. Just a matter of
highlighting the next image, and hitting ENTER. Caution:
make notes of where you are, because there is no on-screen
record of which segment was just completed, and which is next
due. There is the highlight cursor bar, of course, which
normally would be sufficient hint ... but, then someone like
me might forget .. was the highlighted segment just completed?
Or, is that the next one due? I just made a pencil/pad
notations to be absolutely certain.

6. Repainting the image(s) took the same amount of time.

BUT ... upon reboot, and with my fingers crossed, the
computer booted up as normally as could be. A complete
success!!

7. At this point, I am now TOTALLY operating on freeware.
(except for WinXP). Ghost is no longer used.
 
J

Jordan

Chief said:
Recently, in a.c.f we have been apprised of the new freeware
offering by D. Guibouret who maintains a site at
www.partition-saving.com.

For the interest of regular a.c.f. participants, I provide
herewith my own first-hand evaluation of this new program.

SNIP

BUT ... upon reboot, and with my fingers crossed, the
computer booted up as normally as could be. A complete
success!!

MAJOR limitation of this program (from the website):

"To save NTFS partitions you must have a FAT partition that can be accessed
by DOS in order to create the backup file (either another partition on hard
drive, or using network mount, ZIP disk, ...)."
 
R

Roger Johansson

Chief Suspect said:
6. Repainting the image(s) took the same amount of time.

BUT ... upon reboot, and with my fingers crossed, the
computer booted up as normally as could be. A complete
success!!

I wonder if it can be made to go faster.
Did you read about its command line parameters and give it a RAM-drive to
use?

I read the documentation to it but have never tried it.
I think I saw some tricks like that you could use to make it faster.
It was interesting to read your report.
 
B

Bjorn Simonsen

Recently, in a.c.f we have been apprised of the new freeware
offering by D. Guibouret who maintains a site at
www.partition-saving.com.

For the interest of regular a.c.f. participants, I provide
herewith my own first-hand evaluation of this new program.

Thank you very much for your detailed step by step review.
Much appreciated!
5. The repainting of the image(s) back onto the hard drive
partition were a sort of reverse process; the program calling
for each of the image segments as needed. Just a matter of
highlighting the next image, and hitting ENTER. Caution:
make notes of where you are, because there is no on-screen
record of which segment was just completed, and which is next
due. There is the highlight cursor bar, of course, which
normally would be sufficient hint ... but, then someone like
me might forget .. was the highlighted segment just completed?
Or, is that the next one due? I just made a pencil/pad
notations to be absolutely certain.

Good observation, easy to forget where you are, particularly the
process takes a while to complete. So thanks for the warning and
suggestion, keep pencil and notepad handy. Maybe if the author reads
this he could consider creating a "last copied" (or "used") on-screen
record (what you are indirectly suggesting) in the window where you
select the image files to be coped from. Like, in the beginning of a
session the field will be blank, but when the program is done with the
first image, its file name would show in a last used field, and so on.

All the best,
Bjorn Simonsen
 
C

Chief Suspect

Jordan said:
MAJOR limitation of this program (from the website):

"To save NTFS partitions you must have a FAT partition that can be accessed
by DOS in order to create the backup file (either another partition on hard
drive, or using network mount, ZIP disk, ...)."
=========================================================

Many thanks for recalling this to my attention. It was not a concern to me
since
all my partitions are FAT-32 ... I simply must have easy access for DOS to
see
my drives. But, since you mentioned it ... the freeware NTFS Reader can be
found at:

http://www.ntfs.com/products.htm
 
R

REM

"Chief Suspect" <Chief Suspect @ Yahoo . Com> wrote:
Recently, in a.c.f we have been apprised of the new freeware
offering by D. Guibouret who maintains a site at
www.partition-saving.com.

For the interest of regular a.c.f. participants, I provide
herewith my own first-hand evaluation of this new program.
6. Repainting the image(s) took the same amount of time.
BUT ... upon reboot, and with my fingers crossed, the
computer booted up as normally as could be. A complete
success!!
7. At this point, I am now TOTALLY operating on freeware.
(except for WinXP). Ghost is no longer used.

Congratulations, and thanks for the feedback. I've thought of trying
it several times, but for one reason or another I never have. It
sounds like a great freeware.
 
B

Bjorn Simonsen

Jordan wrote in said:
MAJOR limitation of this program (from the website):

"To save NTFS partitions you must have a FAT partition that can be accessed
by DOS in order to create the backup file (either another partition on hard
drive, or using network mount, ZIP disk, ...)."

Certainly a limitation, and thus a fair warning it is.

But in all fairness, allow me in the context of said limitation to add
that the sentence before the one you quoted begins with

"However since Microsoft have never published specifications on
NTFS structure[...]".

So no wonder the program can not write to NTFS partitions. Only a few
third-party programs can . Just mentioning this "for the record", in
case anyone should infer blame here. Because if anyone is to blame for
the limitation it is MS, and partly also their users. Users (at least
the "informed" users) have them selves to blame if they have made them
selves totally dependent on a proprietary file system that no one but
MS and a very few others (who can afford it) can handle. :)

All the best,
Bjorn Simonsen
 
B

Bjorn Simonsen

Bjorn Simonsen wrote in said:
Good observation, easy to forget where you are, particularly the
process takes a while to complete. So thanks for the warning and
suggestion, keep pencil and notepad handy. Maybe if the author reads
this he could consider creating a "last copied" (or "used") on-screen
record (what you are indirectly suggesting) in the window where you
select the image files to be coped from.

He will implement such a feature, or something like it. Received an
e-mail from him the other day, after having sent him a link to this
thread with the hands-on review by Chief Suspect
<http://makeashorterlink.com/?O13A3185>.
Author Damien Guibouret says thanks. Unfortunately he is not able to
read or monitor newsgroups like this one. So if anyone has suggestions
for or comments about his program - he wish they would e-mail him
about it (but do not expect a fast response ;). See website for his
e-mail address <http://www.partition-saving.com>.


All the best,
Bjorn Simonsen
 
D

Daphne Eze

Bjorn said:
He will implement such a feature, or something like it. Received an
e-mail from him the other day, after having sent him a link to this
thread with the hands-on review by Chief Suspect
<http://makeashorterlink.com/?O13A3185>.
Author Damien Guibouret says thanks. Unfortunately he is not able to
read or monitor newsgroups like this one. So if anyone has suggestions
for or comments about his program - he wish they would e-mail him
about it (but do not expect a fast response ;). See website for his
e-mail address <http://www.partition-saving.com>.


All the best,
Bjorn Simonsen

After reading the thread I got my courage together and tried the
program. It was very straight forward. When I restored it everything
workied very well.

I really appreciated the evaluation!

Cheers
Daphne
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top