routing table

G

Guest

I have server 2003 with two nics. the 63.105.21.22 is a dsl modem attached to the internet. The 192.168.0.1 nic is attached to my internal network. The server can surf the net but the internal network can't. Here's my routing table, can anyone see anything srong with it? Shouldn't there be a static route from 192.168.0.1 to 63.105.21.22
Active Routes
Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metri
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 63.105.21.1 63.105.21.22 3
63.105.21.0 255.255.255.0 63.105.21.22 63.105.21.22 3
63.105.21.22 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 3
63.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 63.105.21.22 63.105.21.22 3
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.1 2
192.168.0.1 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 2
192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.1 2
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 63.105.21.22 63.105.21.22 3
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.1 2
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 63.105.21.22 63.105.21.22
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.1
Default Gateway: 63.105.21.
==========================================================================
Persistent Routes
None
 
D

Dusty Harper {MS}

Couple of things.

1) do your clients ont he 192.168.0.X network have their default
gateway set to 192.168.0.1?

2) Are you using NAT from RRAS or are you using Internet Connection
Sharing? Both of these provide a NAT functionality which is needed when
going from a private address range to any public Internet range..

To answer your question, no there should not be a route that goes from
192.168.0.1 to 63.105.21.22. This is handled by the interface routes and a
routers internal forwarding mechanism.

--
--
Dusty Harper
Microsoft Corporation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This posting is provided "AS IS", with NO warranties and confers NO rights
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

comslave said:
I have server 2003 with two nics. the 63.105.21.22 is a dsl modem
attached to the internet. The 192.168.0.1 nic is attached to my internal
network. The server can surf the net but the internal network can't.
Here's my routing table, can anyone see anything srong with it? Shouldn't
there be a static route from 192.168.0.1 to 63.105.21.22?
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

Problem about NATTING in WinCE 0
Routing 1
RRAS: Problems with NAT 4
Site-to-Site VPN 0
RRAS problem 5
CMAK VPNs not working as expected. 3
Can XP Pro act as a router (no ICS) 8
Routing/forvarding problem 1

Top