H
HistoryFan
I've been using XP Home SP1 for 2.5 months now and have been trying to
evaluate it. I would say the biggest difference I have noticed between XP
and its predecessors is that when a program malfunctions, it doesn't crash
the whole system. You merely close out the damaged program and go onto
other things. With 95, 98 or ME, usually the whole darn computer would
freeze up.
The XP graphics and icons are smoother and more eye-catching, for
what's that's worth. System Restore is a VERY useful tool. As far as
hardware, I've had some trouble with older USB devices that are supposedly
XP compatible, but eventually I got them working. For now.
In conclusion, XP is definitely better than 95, 98 or ME. But its
not perfect. I still get the occasional error message and sometimes
programs will freeze up. But being a Windows user I'm used to that anyway.
evaluate it. I would say the biggest difference I have noticed between XP
and its predecessors is that when a program malfunctions, it doesn't crash
the whole system. You merely close out the damaged program and go onto
other things. With 95, 98 or ME, usually the whole darn computer would
freeze up.
The XP graphics and icons are smoother and more eye-catching, for
what's that's worth. System Restore is a VERY useful tool. As far as
hardware, I've had some trouble with older USB devices that are supposedly
XP compatible, but eventually I got them working. For now.
In conclusion, XP is definitely better than 95, 98 or ME. But its
not perfect. I still get the occasional error message and sometimes
programs will freeze up. But being a Windows user I'm used to that anyway.