I didn't know that Herb was an MVP, but I would assume that it would,
given that braindumps are illegal. I asked him about the links in the
past, and he told me that he has no ethical issues with posting the
links.
The problem is largely the definition of "braindump" which evolved over the
years (much like hacker) -- when I used it years ago, I meant only notes
for yourself or suggestions on what others should study and NEVER actual
questions and answers.
(The link you referenced has been gone for some time and even then
the destination of that link had not been updated since 1999 and seldom
contained
actual questions or answers since those who maintained that site discouraged
that too; nothing like the current "Real Questions and Answers" web sites.)
Please note that your NDA is (by MS) NULL & VOID once something is
publicly known, but even then *I* never have and never will report actual
questions and answers.
If you check my posts over the years you will find that I have ALWAYS
avoiding posting questions or answers and have encouraged everyone to
avoid "studying from braindump sites" or even from "practice tests."
This doesn't mean that I have told people not to use "practice tests" but
rather just not to "STUDY" from them but use them to find weaknesses
in their own preparation for ACTUAL STUDY from the Product, TechNet,
or a good source.
Let's stick to technical subjects on the newsgroup. I will be happy to
argue
if someone posts a technical error OR happy to hear about it if I post one
myself.
