Recurrent problem with XP boot

N

Noca2plus

The problem
-----------
My WinXP computer will not boot from its hard drive. Shortly after POST, it
displays the message "A disk read error occurred. Press Ctrl+Alt+Del to
restart." I cannot get the option of starting in Safe Mode or restoring Last
Known Good Configuration by pressing <f8> at startup. The boot.ini is intact
(see below), but adding the /safeboot:minimal switch (
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/833721/en-us) does not change the error
message (i.e., it doesn't enter safe mode).

The data on the hard drive appears intact. If I boot into Recovery Console
from the WinXP Installation CD, I can see the files on the drive just fine.
I've also installed a fresh copy of XP on a spare drive, making my "broken"
drive the slave, and again, I can access the files just fine (this is how I
edited the boot.ini file of the broken drive)

The hard drive doesn't appear to be failing. I ran chkdsk /r from the spare
drive (targeting the "broken" drive) and while it corrected "errors in the
Volume Bitmap", no bad sectors were found (the drive still has zero bad
sectors). I also ran HDTune ( http://www.hdtune.com/ ), and the drive's
SMART status is all OK. I've run a lot of diagnostics on the drive and the
drive functions consistently. There's no hint (other than the inability to
boot) that the drive is "flaky" or showing inconsistent problems.

No other hardware on this computer appears to be failing. As mentioned
above, I installed XP to a spare drive on this same computer, and it seems to
be working fine. I've run many diagnostics on this spare drive as well. The
consistency of the computer's performance after the crash suggests that this
not a power- or power supply-related problem. Also, the consistency with
which this problem recurrs (see below) suggests it is not caused by random
errors in a failing component.

The drive does not appear to have a known virus. Booting from the spare
drive, I scanned the broken drive with Sophos anti-virus and Sophos
anti-rootkit. It was clean. Just to be sure, I also booted from a BartPE CD
( http://www.nu2.nu/pebuilder/ ) and scanned the drive with the latest
McAffee command line scanner. Again, it was clean. The one caveat here is
that, because I didn't boot from the broken drive, its registry was probably
not scanned.

Booting off a WinXP floppy boot disk (
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314079/en-us ) does not allow the "broken"
hard drive to boot. I consistently get a different error message at start
up: "<windows root>\system32\hal.dll is missing or corrupt" The floppy boot
disk works fine in other computers and in this same computer when booting off
the "spare" drive. In booting off the "broken" drive (with the floppy), I
can get to the boot options screen by pressing <F8>, but selecting either
Safe mode or Last Known Good results in the same complaint about hal.dll.
I've replaced hal.dll on the "broken" drive with a (good) copy from the
"spare" drive, but that didn't change anything.

On the broken drive, the Master Boot Record and the primary partition's boot
sector appear to be intact (it's a basic disk, no dynamic volume). TestDisk
6.9 ( http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/TestDisk ) reported the MBR and Boot
Sector to be OK, and the 2 boot sector copies to be identical. Running
fixmbr and fixboot didn't help.


The problem Recurs
------------------
The most frustrating aspect of this "crash" is that it recurs after
restoring from backup with exactly the same symptoms. The first time it
happened, I spent a few days trying to fix it, including an "in-place" (no
reformat) reinstallation of WinXP, but nothing helped, so I gave up. I
reformatted the drive, reinstalled XP, and did a complete restore (including
system state) from backup (I use Retrospect 6.5). I was loath to perform a
"clean" reinstall of all my applications because I had just performed such a
clean reinstall about 4 months prior to this first "crash". After the
restore, I performed extensive checks with chkdsk, Sophos anti-virus, and
Rootkit Revealer (
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb897445.aspx ). Everything
came up clean. So, I decided to move on.

Then, about 2 weeks later, the drive "crashed" in the same exact way --
Won't boot (same error message), but the drive is accessible and the files
are intact. Again, I performed numerous checks, but eventually gave up
again. Switching my backup schedule from weekly to daily, I reformatted the
drive and restored from backup. Everything seemed fine. I crossed my
fingers.

But sure enough, 9 days later, the drive "crashed" in exactly the same way.
Won't boot (same error message), but files are intact. It is this third
crash state that I'm presently working with.

I don't recall any common activity that triggered the three crashes. In all
cases, the shutdown immediately preceding the crash was unremarkable -- no
new software installed -- no catastrophic error message.


Present situation (not good)
----------------------------
I feel I'm in quite a pickle. The drive's symptoms point to a
software-based problem. This could indicate as-yet-unknown malware. A clean
reinstall (i.e., only restore data files from backup, not applications and
system state) might fix the problem. But then again, the hypothetical
malware could be IN my data files. The only guarrantee from a clean
reinstall is that I'll spend another couple days cobbling my computer back
together again.

I've also thought about purchasing another hard drive of similar size to
restore to. This would difinitevly rule out hardware problems with the drive
itself. However, this plan has similar drawbacks. That is, the only
guarrantee is that I'll have spent money on another hard drive. If the
problem is indeed software-based, I imagine I'll have the same trouble within
a fortnight.

The damage to the drive appears minor. It won't boot, but little else
appears wrong. However, try as I might, I can't seem to get the drive to
boot.


Further thoughts
----------------
The "Disk Read Error" on startup appears to come from the boot sector. Disk
probe from the XP support tools (
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/306794/en-us ) shows this error text in the
boot sector (sector 63), and changing the text in the boot sector changes the
the error message displayed on startup.

The "Disk Read Error" occurs early in startup -- before the
\windows\ntbtlog.txt is written (appended). I added the /bootlog switch to
the boot.ini, but no text is ever written to ntbtlog.txt. The boot sector
also tests for the presence of ntldr in the root directory, and has separate
error text for complaining when ntldr is absent (I confirmed this with my
spare drive). However, renaming ntldr on my "broken" drive doesn't change
the error message on boot. It seems that the read error occurs even before
the boot sector code attempts to load ntldr, yet isn't a problem with the
boot sector itself. I'm not sure what all happens between the MBR passing
control to the boot sector and the boot sector loading ntldr. Locating the
MFT likely occurs during this time, but the logical cluster number for $MFT
in the boot sector (as reported by SecInspect.exe) appears to be correct (I
checked with dskprobe.exe). Besides, I'm not sure I could acccess the broken
drive's files from the spare if the boot sector had wrong information about
the MFT location.

It seems that a floppy boot disk should bypass problems with the "broken"
drive's boot sector code. However, because I cannot boot successfully off a
floppy (see above), there may be more than one problem: an early problem
that triggers the "disk read error" when booting strictly from the hard
drive. And a later problem that triggers the "hal.dll missing or corrupt"
when booting from the floppy.

In any case, both problems occur before the windows\ntbtlog.txt file is
written, so I can't confirm any particular file as being properly loaded
(actually, it seems likely that nothing is getting loaded because renaming
ntldr doesn't change the error message). To test the possibility of corrupt
files, I copied several files off the "broken" drive and put them into
service on my spare drive to see if the spare drive would inherit the
problems. These included boot.ini, ntldr, ntdetect.com, ntoskrnl.exe,
hal.dll, kdcom.dll, and bootvid.dll. All worked fine on the spare drive.

Using my spare drive, I've examined the event log for the broken drive. The
last entry (3/6/2008 1:52:39AM) is for the Event log service stopping, which
I think indicates a normal shutdown (not a crash). The \windows\bootstat.dat
file has a modify date of 3/6/2008 1:52:58AM, which suggests the computer
never successfully booted after that time (the last successful boot appears
to have been that morning -- 3/8/2008 8:06AM). Looking back further in the
event log, about 24hrs before this last shutdown, there is a series of about
20 events involving Windows File Protection. The series starts at 3/5/2008
12:42AM with the restoration of c:\windows\fonts\marlett.ttf and ends at
3/5/2008 4:59AM with the restoration of c:\windows\system32\oleaccrc.dll.
It's unlikely I was using the computer during that time. Curious behavior to
be sure. I don't know if similar WFP activity preceded the other two
"crashes". And I don't see any particularly critical files (e.g., ntldr)
being restored by WFP.


I sure would appreciate any help you can give me.
 
P

philo

Noca2plus said:
The problem
-----------
My WinXP computer will not boot from its hard drive. Shortly after POST, it
displays the message "A disk read error occurred. Press Ctrl+Alt+Del to
restart." I cannot get the option of starting in Safe Mode or restoring Last
Known Good Configuration by pressing <f8> at startup. The boot.ini is intact
(see below), but adding the /safeboot:minimal switch (
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/833721/en-us) does not change the error
message (i.e., it doesn't enter safe mode).

The data on the hard drive appears intact. If I boot into Recovery Console
from the WinXP Installation CD, I can see the files on the drive just fine.
I've also installed a fresh copy of XP on a spare drive, making my "broken"
drive the slave, and again, I can access the files just fine (this is how I
edited the boot.ini file of the broken drive)

The hard drive doesn't appear to be failing. I ran chkdsk /r from the spare
drive (targeting the "broken" drive) and while it corrected "errors in the
Volume Bitmap", no bad sectors were found (the drive still has zero bad
sectors). I also ran HDTune ( http://www.hdtune.com/ ), and the drive's
SMART status is all OK. I've run a lot of diagnostics on the drive and the
drive functions consistently. There's no hint (other than the inability to
boot) that the drive is "flaky" or showing inconsistent problems.

No other hardware on this computer appears to be failing. As mentioned
above, I installed XP to a spare drive on this same computer, and it seems to
be working fine. I've run many diagnostics on this spare drive as well. The
consistency of the computer's performance after the crash suggests that this
not a power- or power supply-related problem. Also, the consistency with
which this problem recurrs (see below) suggests it is not caused by random
errors in a failing component.

The drive does not appear to have a known virus. Booting from the spare
drive, I scanned the broken drive with Sophos anti-virus and Sophos
anti-rootkit. It was clean. Just to be sure, I also booted from a BartPE CD
( http://www.nu2.nu/pebuilder/ ) and scanned the drive with the latest
McAffee command line scanner. Again, it was clean. The one caveat here is
that, because I didn't boot from the broken drive, its registry was probably
not scanned.

Booting off a WinXP floppy boot disk (
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314079/en-us ) does not allow the "broken"
hard drive to boot. I consistently get a different error message at start
up: "<windows root>\system32\hal.dll is missing or corrupt" The floppy boot
disk works fine in other computers and in this same computer when booting off
the "spare" drive. In booting off the "broken" drive (with the floppy), I
can get to the boot options screen by pressing <F8>, but selecting either
Safe mode or Last Known Good results in the same complaint about hal.dll.
I've replaced hal.dll on the "broken" drive with a (good) copy from the
"spare" drive, but that didn't change anything.

On the broken drive, the Master Boot Record and the primary partition's boot
sector appear to be intact (it's a basic disk, no dynamic volume). TestDisk
6.9 ( http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/TestDisk ) reported the MBR and Boot
Sector to be OK, and the 2 boot sector copies to be identical. Running
fixmbr and fixboot didn't help.


The problem Recurs
------------------
The most frustrating aspect of this "crash" is that it recurs after
restoring from backup with exactly the same symptoms. The first time it
happened, I spent a few days trying to fix it, including an "in-place" (no
reformat) reinstallation of WinXP, but nothing helped, so I gave up. I
reformatted the drive, reinstalled XP, and did a complete restore (including
system state) from backup (I use Retrospect 6.5). I was loath to perform a
"clean" reinstall of all my applications because I had just performed such a
clean reinstall about 4 months prior to this first "crash". After the
restore, I performed extensive checks with chkdsk, Sophos anti-virus, and
Rootkit Revealer (
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb897445.aspx ). Everything
came up clean. So, I decided to move on.

Then, about 2 weeks later, the drive "crashed" in the same exact way --
Won't boot (same error message), but the drive is accessible and the files
are intact. Again, I performed numerous checks, but eventually gave up
again. Switching my backup schedule from weekly to daily, I reformatted the
drive and restored from backup. Everything seemed fine. I crossed my
fingers.

But sure enough, 9 days later, the drive "crashed" in exactly the same way.
Won't boot (same error message), but files are intact. It is this third
crash state that I'm presently working with.

I don't recall any common activity that triggered the three crashes. In all
cases, the shutdown immediately preceding the crash was unremarkable -- no
new software installed -- no catastrophic error message.


Present situation (not good)
----------------------------
I feel I'm in quite a pickle. The drive's symptoms point to a
software-based problem. This could indicate as-yet-unknown malware. A clean
reinstall (i.e., only restore data files from backup, not applications and
system state) might fix the problem. But then again, the hypothetical
malware could be IN my data files. The only guarrantee from a clean
reinstall is that I'll spend another couple days cobbling my computer back
together again.

I've also thought about purchasing another hard drive of similar size to
restore to. This would difinitevly rule out hardware problems with the drive
itself. However, this plan has similar drawbacks. That is, the only
guarrantee is that I'll have spent money on another hard drive. If the
problem is indeed software-based, I imagine I'll have the same trouble within
a fortnight.

The damage to the drive appears minor. It won't boot, but little else
appears wrong. However, try as I might, I can't seem to get the drive to
boot.


Further thoughts
----------------
The "Disk Read Error" on startup appears to come from the boot sector. Disk
probe from the XP support tools (
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/306794/en-us ) shows this error text in the
boot sector (sector 63), and changing the text in the boot sector changes the
the error message displayed on startup.

The "Disk Read Error" occurs early in startup -- before the
\windows\ntbtlog.txt is written (appended). I added the /bootlog switch to
the boot.ini, but no text is ever written to ntbtlog.txt. The boot sector
also tests for the presence of ntldr in the root directory, and has separate
error text for complaining when ntldr is absent (I confirmed this with my
spare drive). However, renaming ntldr on my "broken" drive doesn't change
the error message on boot. It seems that the read error occurs even before
the boot sector code attempts to load ntldr, yet isn't a problem with the
boot sector itself. I'm not sure what all happens between the MBR passing
control to the boot sector and the boot sector loading ntldr. Locating the
MFT likely occurs during this time, but the logical cluster number for $MFT
in the boot sector (as reported by SecInspect.exe) appears to be correct (I
checked with dskprobe.exe). Besides, I'm not sure I could acccess the broken
drive's files from the spare if the boot sector had wrong information about
the MFT location.

It seems that a floppy boot disk should bypass problems with the "broken"
drive's boot sector code. However, because I cannot boot successfully off a
floppy (see above), there may be more than one problem: an early problem
that triggers the "disk read error" when booting strictly from the hard
drive. And a later problem that triggers the "hal.dll missing or corrupt"
when booting from the floppy.

In any case, both problems occur before the windows\ntbtlog.txt file is
written, so I can't confirm any particular file as being properly loaded
(actually, it seems likely that nothing is getting loaded because renaming
ntldr doesn't change the error message). To test the possibility of corrupt
files, I copied several files off the "broken" drive and put them into
service on my spare drive to see if the spare drive would inherit the
problems. These included boot.ini, ntldr, ntdetect.com, ntoskrnl.exe,
hal.dll, kdcom.dll, and bootvid.dll. All worked fine on the spare drive.

Using my spare drive, I've examined the event log for the broken drive. The
last entry (3/6/2008 1:52:39AM) is for the Event log service stopping, which
I think indicates a normal shutdown (not a crash). The \windows\bootstat.dat
file has a modify date of 3/6/2008 1:52:58AM, which suggests the computer
never successfully booted after that time (the last successful boot appears
to have been that morning -- 3/8/2008 8:06AM). Looking back further in the
event log, about 24hrs before this last shutdown, there is a series of about
20 events involving Windows File Protection. The series starts at 3/5/2008
12:42AM with the restoration of c:\windows\fonts\marlett.ttf and ends at
3/5/2008 4:59AM with the restoration of c:\windows\system32\oleaccrc.dll.
It's unlikely I was using the computer during that time. Curious behavior to
be sure. I don't know if similar WFP activity preceded the other two
"crashes". And I don't see any particularly critical files (e.g., ntldr)
being restored by WFP.


I sure would appreciate any help you can give me.



If the drive "crashed" even after restoring from a backup...then it's pretty
likely the drive itself is bad.

Try restoring your backup to another harddrive...and if it works, then that
will confirm things.

Your post was quite long and I just skimmed it...
but when you have a questionable HD...it's necessary to run the harddrive
manufacturer's diagnostic.
Running chkdsk is not a sufficient test for HD failure.

Also note: If the mfg diagnostic passes the drive, though it's probably
good...

it could still be bad as verified by empirical results
 
P

Patrick Keenan

Noca2plus said:
The problem
-----------
My WinXP computer will not boot from its hard drive. Shortly after POST,
it
displays the message "A disk read error occurred. Press Ctrl+Alt+Del to
restart." I cannot get the option of starting in Safe Mode or restoring
Last
Known Good Configuration by pressing <f8> at startup. The boot.ini is
intact
(see below), but adding the /safeboot:minimal switch (
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/833721/en-us) does not change the error
message (i.e., it doesn't enter safe mode).

The data on the hard drive appears intact. If I boot into Recovery
Console
from the WinXP Installation CD, I can see the files on the drive just
fine.
I've also installed a fresh copy of XP on a spare drive, making my
"broken"
drive the slave, and again, I can access the files just fine (this is how
I
edited the boot.ini file of the broken drive)

The hard drive doesn't appear to be failing.

Sorry, but regular "disk read" errors point directly to failing hardware.
Try reseating the cable and be sure the drive is properly recognised in the
BIOS.

If your data and time have any value, just get another disk, recover your
data, and retire that drive. Mark it as failing, write on the label, so
that you don't forget that it is unreliable. Use a wipe tool to clear the
drive if you aren't comfortable with destroying it yet. This task will
likely take much less time than playing around with failing hardware.

Where I am, new drives range from under $50 for an 80 gig drive to just
over $120 for 500 gig. How much is your time and data worth?

<snippage>
 
W

w_tom

My WinXPcomputerwill not boot from its hard drive.  Shortly after POST, it
displays the message "A disk read error occurred.  Press Ctrl+Alt+Del to
restart."  I cannot get the option of starting in Safe Mode or restoringLast
Known Good Configuration by pressing <f8> at startup.  The boot.ini is intact
(see below), but adding the /safeboot:minimal switch (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/833721/en-us) does not change the error
message (i.e., it doesn't enter safe mode).

The data on the hard drive appears intact.  If I boot into Recovery Console
from the WinXP Installation CD, I can see the files on the drive just fine..  
...

Ironically, nothing posted says the disk drive is 'just fine'.
Appreciate what Windows does. It sees failing hardware, works around
the failure, and moves on. Is that hardware defective? Windows will
record detected problems in system (event) logs. Get that information
before too much is lost. Don't go about fixing something without
first learning what is wrong AND without consulting those logs.

Is the hard drive OK? Better computer manufacturers provide (for
free) comprehensive hardware diagnostics. Sounds like your machine is
not from a more responsible source. Therefore download disk
diagnostics from the drive manufacturer. Only useful hardware
information comes from diagnostics that operate without Windows.
Windows will only complicate a hardware analysis. Chkdsk also reports
little useful (other than detailed list of harmed files or indexes).

Meanwhile, what makes a hard drive or other things appear
defective? Well, what also makes doors inside a house appear
defective? The foundation. Foundation for a computer is its power
supply 'system'. A power supply is only one part of that system - IOW
don't start making assumptions. Inspect that 'system' before trying
to fix anything. That means putting a maximum load on the
'system' (multitask access to as many computer peripherals as
possible) and then measure voltages on any one of orange, red, and
yellow wires with a 3.5 digit multimeter. Any number below 3.23,
4.87, or 11.7 means that 'system' must be fixed before even testing a
disk drive.

Three things needed so that a next reply is useful: system logs,
manufacturer diagnostics, and voltage numbers.
 
N

Noca2plus

I appreciate the time you took to help me with my problem. And indeed,
listening to your suggestions lead me to the correct answer. My computer is
now fixed. The solution was to repartition my drive such that my boot
partition was no larger than 128GB. (2^17 MB)

It turned out that the culprit was my system BIOS only supporting 28-bit LBA
(rather than 48-bit). However, the problem was not how you might initially
assume.

My BIOS has had the most recent update for several years now (It's an old
Gateway from 2001), and gave no indication that it only supported 28-bit LBA.
However, I eventually found a untility from Intel that revealed the truth:
http://www.intel.com/support/chipsets/iaa/sb/cs-009302.htm

Just to be clear, my BIOS _did_ report the correct size of my drive. And on
a clean WinXP SP2 install, the installation _also_ reported the correct size.

As for things people suggested:
1) Run manufacturers diags. Thanks for the tip. I had no idea Chkdsk was
inadequate. The drive was a 200GB Seagate, so I picked up SeaTools --
http://www.seagate.com/www/en-us/support/downloads/seatools/ . Got the DOS
version and booted into it via a CD. Everything checked out fine with both
the short and long test.

2) Check the voltages. Another excellent suggestion. The ranges w_tom
suggested were tighter than the manufacturer's specifications. Nonetheless,
my 11V line failed based on w_tom's criteria. I bought a new power supply
just for kicks. It met w_tom's criteria. I initially checked everything
with a voltmeter, but later I found this nifty utility from Intel that checks
voltages and temp through software:
http://www.intel.com/design/motherbd/active.htm

3) Buy a new hard drive. While my 200GB was fine, purchasing a new 500GB
drive turned out to be important in solving my problem.

My system gave no indication it couldn't recognize drives beyond 128GB (the
28-bit LBA limit). My 200GB drive had been working fine for over a year.
And in later testing, I found I could write more than 128GB to the drive with
no problem. Apparently, WinXP SP2 handles 48-bit LBA just fine even when
support from the BIOS is lacking.

However, in the early boot stages, the computer is still reliant on the BIOS
for disk access. And this is where I had my problem. Apparently booting a
large (>128GB) disk with 28-bit LBA BIOS is not a problem per se, but one
thing that the NTFS boot sector code apparently does is check out the MFT and
the MFT mirror on the boot partition. And apparently, NTFS places the MFT
mirror in the MIDDLE of the boot partition.

I had formatted my 200GB drive as a single boot partition (C:). Initially
this was no problem because the entire MFT mirror existed below the 128GB
mark that my 28-bit LBA BIOS could see. And then of course, once WinXP
loaded, seeing beyond that 128GB mark was no problem. The problem was that
eventually my MFT mirror grew beyond the 128GB mark. This caused the boot
sector code to fail early in startup when the MFT mirror was accessed. This
explains why deleting ntldr from my boot partition had no effect on the error
message I received -- the error was occuring before ntldr was loaded -- in
the boot sector code.

This also explains why my "crash" was recurrent -- everytime I restored from
backup... I was knocking back the MFT mirror just a little... enough to
boot... and then within a couple weeks it would grow beyond the 128GB mark
again. And once that happened, my computer would never boot until I restored
from backup again.

This also explains why my data appeared intact after each crash. It was!
The problem was strictly with the boot process.

This also explains why fixmbr and fixboot had no effect. Neither the MBR
nor the boot sector was corrupt.

One prediction of this situation is that any boot partition greater than
256GB will fail upon its first boot, regardless of how many files are on it
because the MFT mirror will begin beyond 128GB. And this is exactly what
happened when I did a clean WinXP install to the brand new 500GB drive I
bought. The installation from CD went fine, but upon the first boot (to
complete the installation), I got the same Read Error that I had gotten after
a year of use on my 200GB drive.

However, on reinstalling WinXP to that same drive, on a 128GB partition
(instead of the whole 500GB), the drive booted fine. Again, this is
consistent with the MFT mirror's location in the middle of the boot partition
being the issue.

So anyway, I thought of some complicated ways to get a 500GB boot partition
(merging dynamic disks, etc.), but in the end I just partitioned it in two.
Now I boot off a 128GB C: drive, and the balance is D:.

Thanks again for your help.
 
W

w_tom

Excellent analysis and kudos for posting what was discovered.

NTFS actually creates two tables that (unlike FAT) are located in
different locations on the partition. This so that if one table is
harmed, the other table is physically elsewhere - less likely to be
harmed.

The Intel utility to read voltages is dependent on hardware on the
motherboard. That hardware is intended only for voltage monitoring -
detecting changed. Hardware should be first calibrated with the
meter. Then 'alarm settings' adjusted accordingly.

Gateway has a bad habit of not providing comprehensive hardware
diagnostics and trivial support information. A Gateway support note
or software should have warned you of this failure. An example of why
so other computer manufacturers are far more responsible.

One problem that has occurred even with older technology systems.
As the BIOS counter exceeded its maximum value, then the request for
data from the next sector would, instead, read the Master Boot
record. This would only cause a crash (dependent on where that MBR
was being loaded - as a text file or a program). However, problems
occur when a write is attempted and ends up corrupting the MBR.
Notice how these symptoms would only further confuse the technician.
Just another reason for congratulations on solving a problem that
results in so many confusing symptoms. A superb analysis and a
wonderful example of solving a problem by following the evidence.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top