S
Scott M.
How have I proven my lack of knowledge about USENET? Give me one FACT (not
your opinion on how we should all use the USENET) that supports that
statement, just one. What have I said about USENET that was incorrect?
Tell me..
You think I am a schmuck so you call yourself an "Elder". Think about that,
you insult me in a very childish way and then claim to be an "Elder". What
FACT (not your OPINION of me) supports your claim to be an "Elder".
The FACT that you respond to people the way you do (read your own posts),
coupled with your "Self appointed moderator" signature (FACT) is not
interpreted by me as a self-deprecating joke. I find it hard to believe
that others who do not know you (posters on the USENET) would believe that.
It comes across to me (based on your views of what should/shouldn't be
posted, your repeated insults, and your statements of superiority) that you
like to be in power and control others.
You haven't said ANYTHING in ANY of these posts back and forth that is
FACTUAL about your position or me. We disagree about substance and style,
fine!! I've said that in several of my last posts, but you are not
satisfied to leave it there.
Want to be a wise person? One worthy of the respect of his/her PEERS (not
subordinates, subjects or children)? Then listen and try to understand the
viewpoints of others. You don't have to agree and you don't have to insult
others, you don't need to control, and you don't even have to respond.
your opinion on how we should all use the USENET) that supports that
statement, just one. What have I said about USENET that was incorrect?
Tell me..
You think I am a schmuck so you call yourself an "Elder". Think about that,
you insult me in a very childish way and then claim to be an "Elder". What
FACT (not your OPINION of me) supports your claim to be an "Elder".
The FACT that you respond to people the way you do (read your own posts),
coupled with your "Self appointed moderator" signature (FACT) is not
interpreted by me as a self-deprecating joke. I find it hard to believe
that others who do not know you (posters on the USENET) would believe that.
It comes across to me (based on your views of what should/shouldn't be
posted, your repeated insults, and your statements of superiority) that you
like to be in power and control others.
You haven't said ANYTHING in ANY of these posts back and forth that is
FACTUAL about your position or me. We disagree about substance and style,
fine!! I've said that in several of my last posts, but you are not
satisfied to leave it there.
Want to be a wise person? One worthy of the respect of his/her PEERS (not
subordinates, subjects or children)? Then listen and try to understand the
viewpoints of others. You don't have to agree and you don't have to insult
others, you don't need to control, and you don't even have to respond.