RAM

[Frank]

this is not totally correct... here I go again educating the MVPs and
Vistaboys...

You're not educating anyone. Read the op's question...he's not talking
about servers is he?

If you want or nedd more attention..get a dog!
Frank

 

[Frank]

this is not totally correct...

servers that are 32 bit do support and see more than 4 gb of ram.

Read the op's question...he's not talking about servers is he?

If you want or need more attention..get a dog!
Frank

 

[Tiberius]

shut up baboon snot...

I am saying that 32bit computers can address more ram if
a trick is used..

replying to a post saying that this is a restriction of the 32bit
architecture...

go lay an egg or something

 

[Tiberius]

im not replying to the OP but the person who replied to the OP,

this is called a thread in newsgroups.

Now go away

 

[Frank]

Tiberius wrote:

-----------unnecessary attention getting crap deleted------------

Want or need more attention...get a dog.
But be careful, I heard they bite baboons like you.
Frank

 

[Tiberius]

back into the bozo bin where you belong troll


PLONK!!!

 

[Guest]

Thanks to all for their input, (especially JH). You folks respond really
fast - impressive! It seems going to 64 bit is the way to go, however, I
expect there will be issues with some of the software I use for work, which
is what is keeping me from going to 64bit at the present time. Thanks again
everyone.

JH is right about the need to have matching pairs of RAM in dual channel setups.
If he wants to use 3GB of RAM, he should use 2 matching pairs of 512 MB not one
stick of 1GB.