Print Pal Remanufactured Cartridges?

L

louise

HP 952 C.

I just purchased remanufactured cartridges from Print Pal.
The color cartridge seems to work pretty well. I haven't
tried the b & w because my HP is still ok.

Does anyone know about the quality of the ink used by Print
Pal - how will it stand the test of time etc.

TIA

Louise
 
M

measekite

louise said:
HP 952 C.

I just purchased remanufactured cartridges from Print Pal. The color
cartridge seems to work pretty well. I haven't tried the b & w
because my HP is still ok.

Does anyone know about the quality of the ink used by Print Pal - how
will it stand the test of time etc.


I hear this generic noname ink is terrible. Since you have an HP with
an integrated cart you cannot really destroy your printhead. The worst
that can happen is you have to go out and buy a genuine HP cart
providing the generic cart does not leak and create a mess.
 
L

louise

measekite said:
I hear this generic noname ink is terrible. Since you have an HP with
an integrated cart you cannot really destroy your printhead. The worst
that can happen is you have to go out and buy a genuine HP cart
providing the generic cart does not leak and create a mess.
Oh dear - which brand of remanufactured cartridge would you
recommend for this printer? I would very much like to avoid
pouring ink and want to find ones that come ready to install.

Thanks again.

Louise
 
T

TJ

louise said:
HP 952 C.

I just purchased remanufactured cartridges from Print Pal. The color
cartridge seems to work pretty well. I haven't tried the b & w because
my HP is still ok.

Does anyone know about the quality of the ink used by Print Pal - how
will it stand the test of time etc.

TIA

Louise

Louise, be aware that Measekite is well known to be of the opinion that
anything but ink from the OEM of any printer is "terrible."

That said, he may have a point in this case. Not about OEM vs.
aftermarket ink, but with this particular vendor. Check out this site
for a number of customer reviews:

http://www.resellerratings.com/seller2279.html

TJ
 
B

Burt

louise said:
Oh dear - which brand of remanufactured cartridge would you recommend for
this printer? I would very much like to avoid pouring ink and want to
find ones that come ready to install.

Thanks again.

Louise

Louise - I see that you've met our resident troll. His purpose in life
appears to be to tell every user of aftermarket inks that they are terrible
and will ruin your printer. There are some aftermarket inks that are just
fine and there are also apparently some that are bad. I refill Canon
cartridges with bulk ink that is excellent, and they haven't done any harm
to my printers in almost two years. Measekite won't acknowledge that those
of us who have had good experience with aftermarket inks have any credence.
He spouts his nonsense without having had any personal experience with any
of these products. Totally disregard his input on this subject as he has no
firsthand knowledge at all to back up his statements.
 
T

Tony

louise said:
Oh dear - which brand of remanufactured cartridge would you
recommend for this printer? I would very much like to avoid
pouring ink and want to find ones that come ready to install.

Thanks again.

Louise

Hello Louise
See Burt's and TJ's posts and if you doubt what they are saying just check back
3 months and see what the first responder to your messgae used to post before
he got advised by his ISP to stop using profanity and sexual innuendo. He
(measekite) has zero knowledge of any value with respect to printers.
I don't know Print Pal but if the colour cartridge was OK, then there is no
reason to believe that the black cartridge will be any different. Relax, no
damage can be done to your printer, I have never in many years heard of an HP
or HP compatible cartridge leak in a printer.....thousands of printers in my
case.
Tony
 
T

TJ

TJ said:
Louise, be aware that Measekite is well known to be of the opinion that
anything but ink from the OEM of any printer is "terrible."

That said, he may have a point in this case. Not about OEM vs.
aftermarket ink, but with this particular vendor. Check out this site
for a number of customer reviews:

http://www.resellerratings.com/seller2279.html

I just read more of the reviews at reseller ratings, and most of them
are quite old - in computer terms, at least. It's entirely possible that
they've cleaned up their act by now. It's equally possible that they
haven't, so they still bear watching.

TJ
 
M

measekite

louise said:
Oh dear - which brand of remanufactured cartridge would you recommend
for this printer? I would very much like to avoid pouring ink and
want to find ones that come ready to install.


If you only print business documents and do a great deal of printing
then I guess you take your chances with remfg carts. However, if you do
not print a great deal then I would find the best deal for HP factory
carts. I buy mine at Costco.
 
T

teranews

I have been using printpal.com for my 3 epsons for well over a year
they are great !!
don't believe the idiots like M ? whatever who are without a brain....
 
M

measekite

teranews said:
I have been using printpal.com for my 3 epsons for well over a year
they are great !!
don't believe the idiots like M ? whatever who are without a brain....

Why I think she should believe www.pcworld.com and www.wilhelm.com.
After reading the reports on those site you should then make your decision.
 
R

Richard Steinfeld

TJ wrote:
Check out this site
I just read more of the reviews at reseller ratings, and most of them
are quite old - in computer terms, at least. It's entirely possible that
they've cleaned up their act by now. It's equally possible that they
haven't, so they still bear watching.

TJ

I read the complaints and my opinion is that the reported behavior was
so eggregious that no matter how they'd cleaned up and repented, I'd
avoid them until the end of time. What I read was that they were, at
minimum, an accessory to theft.

The complaints regarded a "site partner" who glommed onto the customers'
credit card numbers during the transaction on the main site, and then
plundered the credit account without notice or permission. If that's not
theft, what is it? PP refused to help, claiming that the partner's
behavior was not their concern (hell, they'd posted some sort of fine
print notice that there are site partners who do what they'll do).

On a general-purpose "public web site," it's common for the site owner
to "take in advertising laundry" to subsidize the cost of running the
site. I can live with that, so long as the overall behavior is
tolerable. Now, let's say, that the site contains five ad service
"partners," each of whose rotating customers places 5 cookies on my
machine per visit in addition to the main site's three cookies: I've
just picked up 28 unwanted files on my hard disk. This is not civilized
behavior, and can create nasty problems down the road for an
unsophisticated user. A site owner is responsible for the behavior that
he subjects his visitors to, including the behavior of his "partners,"
regardless of disclaimers. That's common ethics.

On a commercial web site, a site that I'm using to buy something, to pay
money to the site provider, I do not want to see any third-party
presence. I want this communication to be totally private between me and
the vendor (and maybe a trustworthy payment service). Print Pal violated
this compact.

I'm in awe of what I just found this past week. In checking various ink
sellers, I came across two or three who had partnered with Google for
some sort of search function. And, amazingly, the vendor's site now
presented me with advertising links and blurbs _for their own
competitors!_ Is this stupid or what? Do I want to do business with
anyone this dumb? They probably apply the same care to their ink
formulations, the same care to checking the condition of the cartridges
that they'd ship to me. Frankly, I don't give a damn about "money-back
guarantees." If I've got to send them back a defective product, it's my
dime and my time, and my aggravation. For mail-order and web purchases,
it's got to be right the first time. This begins with being able to
trust their web site.

This says something, doesn't it...

Richard
 
M

measekite

Richard said:
TJ wrote:
Check out this site



I read the complaints and my opinion is that the reported behavior was
so eggregious that no matter how they'd cleaned up and repented, I'd
avoid them until the end of time. What I read was that they were, at
minimum, an accessory to theft.

The complaints regarded a "site partner" who glommed onto the
customers' credit card numbers during the transaction on the main
site, and then plundered the credit account without notice or
permission. If that's not theft, what is it? PP refused to help,
claiming that the partner's behavior was not their concern (hell,
they'd posted some sort of fine print notice that there are site
partners who do what they'll do).

On a general-purpose "public web site," it's common for the site owner
to "take in advertising laundry" to subsidize the cost of running the
site. I can live with that, so long as the overall behavior is
tolerable. Now, let's say, that the site contains five ad service
"partners," each of whose rotating customers places 5 cookies on my
machine per visit in addition to the main site's three cookies: I've
just picked up 28 unwanted files on my hard disk. This is not
civilized behavior, and can create nasty problems down the road for an
unsophisticated user. A site owner is responsible for the behavior
that he subjects his visitors to, including the behavior of his
"partners," regardless of disclaimers. That's common ethics.

On a commercial web site, a site that I'm using to buy something, to
pay money to the site provider, I do not want to see any third-party
presence. I want this communication to be totally private between me
and the vendor (and maybe a trustworthy payment service). Print Pal
violated this compact.

I'm in awe of what I just found this past week. In checking various
ink sellers, I came across two or three who had partnered with Google
for some sort of search function. And, amazingly, the vendor's site
now presented me with advertising links and blurbs _for their own
competitors!_ Is this stupid or what? Do I want to do business with
anyone this dumb? They probably apply the same care to their ink
formulations, the same care to checking the condition of the
cartridges that they'd ship to me.


what do you think i have been trying to say. if they do not disclose
what they are selling and what they are packaging i consider that
unprofessional.
Frankly, I don't give a damn about "money-back guarantees." If I've
got to send them back a defective product, it's my dime and my time,
and my aggravation. For mail-order and web purchases, it's got to be
right the first time. This begins with being able to trust their web
site.


boy it sounds like you are copying my posts. but this stuff i did not
copywrite.
 
G

Gary Tait

He
(measekite) has zero knowledge of any value with respect to printers.

She does have some knowlege not related to ink, but when it comes to
aftermarket inks, she does not get it.
 
M

measekite

Ask your self: Are the people who so vehemently defend generic ink in
the business or associated with it in on way or another. Every week you
find another that has been connected. Soon you do not hear from them
but they seem to reappear under another name.
 
G

Gary Tait

Ask your self: Are the people who so vehemently defend generic ink in
the business or associated with it in on way or another.

Yes, in that most of them, myself included, are nothing more than very
satisified customers of the mentioned ink vendors, and do therefore have
real positive experience with those products, and seek to set the record
you don't get straight.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top