H
Hank Oredson
CJT said:Who would buy something that slow?
A collector of classic systems.
Falls between a typical 8080 (2 MHZ)
and the wonderfully fast 8088 (4.77 MHZ).
--
... Hank
http://horedson.home.att.net
http://w0rli.home.att.net
CJT said:Who would buy something that slow?
Ed said:It's all in the IPC, MHz is just a myth. ;p
JK said:Chips with such a huge cache are very expensive to make. Production
of more complex chips probably results in a larger percentage of
chips that need to be discarded. Much fewer of the more complex chips
fit on a wafer since the die size is so large relative to chips with
a much smaller cache.
Sorry, I can't help it, I've been brainwashed. ;p
What? You're not going to blame the AMD "gang of thugs" in this NG for
your err, bias?
JK said:Where did you see that?
Ed said:I don't understand why the EE costs so much, how much more could it cost
them to make a EE, I thought Intel chips were supposed to get faster and
cheaper, 300mm wafers @ 90nm, what's the problem? Just pure greed?
It's been in the news for some time. Q4 announcement likely to come soon.
925XE is supposed to have the 1 GHz bus and probable support for DDR2-667.
The new EE chip has a 2 MB L2 cache kind of like the Dothan's and is on a
90nm part. Should be a screamer. It's the first of the 700 series of
Pentiums.
George Macdonald said:"EE edition"... "XE edition"... sounds like car mfrs when they have a
turkey on their hands.... 'coming to you from the performance division of
Intel'?<gulp>. So is this thing going to have EM64T and will the 925XE
have the 36-bit data on FSB?
Rgds, George Macdonald
I blame Intel.
JK said:Where did you see that?
I'm almost sure it will have EM64T as it seems Intel will finally release it
for Prescott. I presume it will have the kludgy 36-bit Xeon MP borrowed
data too... or is it 40-bit?
I saw prices around $825 for the P4 3.2 EE. Still too close to the
$1,000 P4 3.4 EE.
Imo the Athlon FX-51 is being discontinued since
the Athlon 64 3800+ is probably less expensive to make than the
FX-51, and seems to perform at least as well in almost all benchmarks.
I don't understand why the EE costs so much, how much more could it cost
them to make a EE, I thought Intel chips were supposed to get faster and
cheaper, 300mm wafers @ 90nm, what's the problem? Just pure greed?
I just ordered a nf3-250 mobo and 3200+ newcastle for under $300, I just
couldn't buy an Intel, not really sure why, must be because all my
friends have A64s, funny cause they wouldn't touch an AMD just a couple
years ago.
Yousuf Khan said:This article states that the original P4EE is being discontinued.
Who cares? I think $100 is too much for a CPU. But $400+??! Ouch.
Indy cars are cool, but not very practical as grocery-getters. (I'm not a
3D gamer or anything like that though, but I think that segment may get
too much press rather than more practical computing).
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.