A
Anonymous
French bill casts chill on open-source
Bill not yet a law, but developers are already feeling the squeeze
News Analysis by Peter Sayer
APRIL 14, 2006 (IDG NEWS SERVICE) - On May 4, the French Senate will
debate a copyright bill that is widely expected to have a chilling
effect on the development and distribution of open-source software for
digital rights management (DRM) or P2P (peer-to-peer) file-sharing.
That's because the bill's provisions include a penalty of up to three
years in prison and a fine of $363,171 for publishing, distributing or
promoting software in France that is "manifestly intended" for the
unauthorized distribution of copyright works.
The developers of the open-source multimedia player VLC, which can read
DRM-protected DVDs, consider themselves targeted. But the legal
uncertainty over the term manifestly intended makes the bill's coverage
so broad that it could even cover the open-source Web server Apache,
which hosts over 60% of Web sites, opponents of the bill say.
Open-source projects are thought to be more vulnerable than commercial
operations because they typically have few resources at their disposal
to defend legal actions.
Read entire 4 page news story at
http://www.computerworld.com/news/2006/story/0,11280,110558,00.html?source=x10
Bill not yet a law, but developers are already feeling the squeeze
News Analysis by Peter Sayer
APRIL 14, 2006 (IDG NEWS SERVICE) - On May 4, the French Senate will
debate a copyright bill that is widely expected to have a chilling
effect on the development and distribution of open-source software for
digital rights management (DRM) or P2P (peer-to-peer) file-sharing.
That's because the bill's provisions include a penalty of up to three
years in prison and a fine of $363,171 for publishing, distributing or
promoting software in France that is "manifestly intended" for the
unauthorized distribution of copyright works.
The developers of the open-source multimedia player VLC, which can read
DRM-protected DVDs, consider themselves targeted. But the legal
uncertainty over the term manifestly intended makes the bill's coverage
so broad that it could even cover the open-source Web server Apache,
which hosts over 60% of Web sites, opponents of the bill say.
Open-source projects are thought to be more vulnerable than commercial
operations because they typically have few resources at their disposal
to defend legal actions.
Read entire 4 page news story at
http://www.computerworld.com/news/2006/story/0,11280,110558,00.html?source=x10