G
Guest
Do we really need a new OS?
Isn't Vista still based on Windows 2000 architecture like XP was? In other
words, can't you simply take XP and add on any support needed for the new
things that Vista are going to support in the form of patches, etc.?
Or is there something I'm overlooking as far as programming architecture
that mandates an entirely new OS?
I know Microsoft need their attrition of billions of dollars (wuteva).
Couldn't we just have XP and be charged minimally for major service packs
that bring us to the equivalent of Vista without all this stupid crap we all
go through to upgrade our OS's (new video cards, more memory, drivers,
program patches, etc.)
Ode to the Mac commercial where the older, socially lame guy is the PC and
going to get his Vista upgrade and may not be coming back, I'm beginning to
agree.
Thoughtfully,
Michael
Isn't Vista still based on Windows 2000 architecture like XP was? In other
words, can't you simply take XP and add on any support needed for the new
things that Vista are going to support in the form of patches, etc.?
Or is there something I'm overlooking as far as programming architecture
that mandates an entirely new OS?
I know Microsoft need their attrition of billions of dollars (wuteva).
Couldn't we just have XP and be charged minimally for major service packs
that bring us to the equivalent of Vista without all this stupid crap we all
go through to upgrade our OS's (new video cards, more memory, drivers,
program patches, etc.)
Ode to the Mac commercial where the older, socially lame guy is the PC and
going to get his Vista upgrade and may not be coming back, I'm beginning to
agree.
Thoughtfully,
Michael