N
Neil
I have Vista and am almost completely happy running the 64 bit version of it
on this computer here. But there's no way in a million years that I would
have taken up Vista if I hadn't been building a new machine. On my last
machine, I kept going with Windows 98 right up until updates and support
were stopped before moving to XP. If I had been simply upgrading parts of
that, for sure it would still be running XP. It was working and it didn't
seem to me that I would be able to do more with XP than I could with 98,
certainly nothing that was worth the extra license fee. I think that must
be even more true with Vista and XP, on both counts. Given I was about to
pay for another OS license for a brand new machine, I thought I may as well
have the new one; I did consider buying another XP license with an upgrade
coupon inside, but in the end got an almost give-away deal on Vista.
I really find it odd that most people posting in this group appear to be
people who are changing OS on existing machines with little or no change in
hardware.
Neil
on this computer here. But there's no way in a million years that I would
have taken up Vista if I hadn't been building a new machine. On my last
machine, I kept going with Windows 98 right up until updates and support
were stopped before moving to XP. If I had been simply upgrading parts of
that, for sure it would still be running XP. It was working and it didn't
seem to me that I would be able to do more with XP than I could with 98,
certainly nothing that was worth the extra license fee. I think that must
be even more true with Vista and XP, on both counts. Given I was about to
pay for another OS license for a brand new machine, I thought I may as well
have the new one; I did consider buying another XP license with an upgrade
coupon inside, but in the end got an almost give-away deal on Vista.
I really find it odd that most people posting in this group appear to be
people who are changing OS on existing machines with little or no change in
hardware.
Neil