R. McCarty said:
Anna,
It's been a while since I've used any of the vendor tools. I was trying
to illustrate that moving to a new drive is to obtain more space. Doing
a "Clone" operation doesn't imply making a partition bigger on the
destination drive. If he had 19.2 Gig of 20.0 used and he clones the
20.0 to an 80.0 that doesn't necessarily give him 19.2 of 80 used.
In other words, I wanted to make clear that not all cloning software
tools allow for resizing as part of the clone process. Many times a
user will do the clone and not understand why there is still some disk
space left unallocated or their XP partition hasn't changed to include
the new drives total size. I still use Partition Magic or sometimes the
disk to disk copy of the older Drive Image program.
Mr. McCarty:
Not to belabor this issue, but let me make this point...
Using any run-of-the-mill disk imaging, i.e., cloning, tool such as Norton
Ghost or Acronis True Image, if the user clones his 20 GB drive, which in
your example contains 19.2 GB of data to a 80 GB drive, then the 80 GB drive
will contain 19.2 GB of data. There will be *no* "unallocated space" on the
80 GB drive following the cloning operation, i.e., disk space that needs to
be partitioned/formatted.
If the user desired multiple partitions on his destination drive, in this
case the 80 GB one (assuming that drive started out with a single
partition), then he or she would first multi-partition the drive following
which he/she could clone the contents of his/her source disk to this or that
partition. So if, for example, the user partitioned his/her 80 GB drive with
30 GB and 50 GB partitions and then cloned the 19.2 GB from the source disk
to the 30 GB partition, there would simply be 19.2 GB of data on that 30 GB
partition, again, with no "unallocated space" that needs
partitioning/formatting.
Are we in agreement on this?
Anna