.NET framework 1.0 or 1.1?

[Chris LaJoie]

I'm debating over which platform I should develop for. 1.0 programs are
'supposedly' compatible with the 1.1 framework, but I had quite an
experience recently with one such app. RegAsm.exe went WAY out of control
and made my hdd unbootable. Luckily I had a little Linux experience, and
was able to set up LILO to boot Windows. This could have been a
once-in-a-lifetime freak occurance, but I won't be trying again anytime
soon.

Anyway, I need the pros and cons of using each.. can anyone provide?
Thanks.

Chris

 

[Cowboy \(Gregory A. Beamer\)]

1.1 is newer, performs better, and has a few more or improved features. I
see no reason to start new development in 1.0, unless you already have 1.0
apps, and your networking dept. is not ready to deploy 1.1. If this is the
case, you have no choice and have to work with 1.0.

--
Gregory A. Beamer
MVP; MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA
Author: ADO.NET and XML: ASP.NET on the Edge

****************************************************************************
****
Think Outside the Box!
****************************************************************************
****

 

[Lloyd Dupont]

that's a very weird experience but...

1. I don't see the link between your problem and wonderment about which
version used
2. In any case, if you fear bug, I will favor 1.1, it's an update version
with LESS bug, or so was its purpose ...