A
Alon Brodski
Hey!
Thanks a lot for your advice!
From what you had told me I understood that if I have a UDMA/33 motherboard
and add a PCI ATA/100 controller card,then even though I won't get beyond
33MB/s (mainboard bottleneck),but still it would be closer to that
theoretical limit,than if I was using old UDMA/33 built in controller?
The reason why I don't feel like wasting an old HD has nothing to do with
space.I don't feel like wasting time to start everything again from the
scratch,nor do I want to use 3rd party software (that needs to be also
BOUGHT)
Partition Magic from Symantec now would cost me like $70 and a new HD like
80.So why bother?
2nd reason is that I'd rather have 2 different partitions- NTFS and FAT on 2
different physical disks.
The only unclear part is how to install Win 98SE on a second HD and to have
a multi boot enabled (after having XP already running).
Another question is....if I install that PCI card....what would happen with
master/slave scheme of ATA in my system? Meaning...I know that normally in a
system you have 2 IDE channels and you can have 4 units installed on them.So
if I add a new controller on a card-then what?I can have up to 8 units then
or not? (like 4 channels with 2 devices on each).And it also is unclear what
you meant exactly when you proposed me to experiment with my older HD to get
a better performance...Say if I have a newer one as a master on one channel
on a PCI card....then the older HD to put as a master on a 1st channel on
the motherboard?(same where it's now)
Or you meant that I should still put the older HD on a PCI card,but on a
different channel there (not the one with newer disk) and also put the older
disk as a master there?I would have like 3 masters in the system them
thanks in advance,
--
Yours truly,
Alon Brodski
Thanks a lot for your advice!
From what you had told me I understood that if I have a UDMA/33 motherboard
and add a PCI ATA/100 controller card,then even though I won't get beyond
33MB/s (mainboard bottleneck),but still it would be closer to that
theoretical limit,than if I was using old UDMA/33 built in controller?
The reason why I don't feel like wasting an old HD has nothing to do with
space.I don't feel like wasting time to start everything again from the
scratch,nor do I want to use 3rd party software (that needs to be also
BOUGHT)
Partition Magic from Symantec now would cost me like $70 and a new HD like
80.So why bother?
2nd reason is that I'd rather have 2 different partitions- NTFS and FAT on 2
different physical disks.
The only unclear part is how to install Win 98SE on a second HD and to have
a multi boot enabled (after having XP already running).
Another question is....if I install that PCI card....what would happen with
master/slave scheme of ATA in my system? Meaning...I know that normally in a
system you have 2 IDE channels and you can have 4 units installed on them.So
if I add a new controller on a card-then what?I can have up to 8 units then
or not? (like 4 channels with 2 devices on each).And it also is unclear what
you meant exactly when you proposed me to experiment with my older HD to get
a better performance...Say if I have a newer one as a master on one channel
on a PCI card....then the older HD to put as a master on a 1st channel on
the motherboard?(same where it's now)
Or you meant that I should still put the older HD on a PCI card,but on a
different channel there (not the one with newer disk) and also put the older
disk as a master there?I would have like 3 masters in the system them

thanks in advance,
--
Yours truly,
Alon Brodski