Myth about desktop

  • Thread starter Thread starter NurAzije
  • Start date Start date
N

NurAzije

Hi,
I am not a microsoft certified, I am just a user of windows XP, I have
a good knowledge surfing around in windows XP.
There is a myth I heard a lot of times but did not read about it
anywhere, so my question is it true?
The Myth: "If I have folders with files on my desktop my computer
speed goes down because everything on desktop is kept on local memory
for faster indexing. If I want to speed up my memory only icons-
shortcuts can be kept on the desktop, the same issue with my documents
older"
I hope someone will give me the right answer with logical explanation
or some urls.ž
Best regards,
Ashraf Gheith
 
News to me....
to my way of thinkin IF you have a folder on the desktop with files in it
instead of just a shortcut TO the folder that is elsewhere then IF by some
chance you delete the folder then you are stuffed well and good.
IF you just have a short cut to said folder then deleting the shortcut to it
still means you have said folder.

As to indexing, I have never enabled it and do not see any difference
speedwise with or without it.

Regarding everything on the desktop being kept in ANY memory then sure,
EVERYTHING on the desktop will be im memory.
Only having desktop icons and shortcuts are not going to make that much
difference to speed or anything else.

Hi,
I am not a microsoft certified, I am just a user of windows XP, I have
a good knowledge surfing around in windows XP.
There is a myth I heard a lot of times but did not read about it
anywhere, so my question is it true?
The Myth: "If I have folders with files on my desktop my computer
speed goes down because everything on desktop is kept on local memory
for faster indexing. If I want to speed up my memory only icons-
shortcuts can be kept on the desktop, the same issue with my documents
older"
I hope someone will give me the right answer with logical explanation
or some urls.ž
Best regards,
Ashraf Gheith
 
Hi,
I am not a microsoft certified, I am just a user of windows XP, I have
a good knowledge surfing around in windows XP.
There is a myth I heard a lot of times but did not read about it
anywhere, so my question is it true?
The Myth: "If I have folders with files on my desktop my computer
speed goes down because everything on desktop is kept on local memory
for faster indexing. If I want to speed up my memory only icons-
shortcuts can be kept on the desktop, the same issue with my documents
older"
I hope someone will give me the right answer with logical explanation
or some urls.ž
Best regards,
Ashraf Gheith

=======

It's a myth.
 
Hi,
I am not a microsoft certified, I am just a user of windows XP, I have
a good knowledge surfing around in windows XP.
There is a myth I heard a lot of times but did not read about it
anywhere, so my question is it true?
The Myth: "If I have folders with files on my desktop my computer
speed goes down because everything on desktop is kept on local memory
for faster indexing. If I want to speed up my memory only icons-
shortcuts can be kept on the desktop, the same issue with my documents
older"
I hope someone will give me the right answer with logical explanation
or some urls.ž
Best regards,
Ashraf Gheith

=======

It's a myth.
Click to expand...

Thank you guys, it have not been logical to me also, but I heard that
more than once from some "experts". So thank you again.
 
Going further into detail on that. Everything that is on your desktop will
show up under C:\Documents and Settings If you click on any of the users
folders there is a subfolder lableded "desktop" where all folders and
shortcuts exist. Anything on the desktop is saved exactly the same way as
everything else on your harddrive.
Hope this helps
-kenkcj

Hi,
I am not a microsoft certified, I am just a user of windows XP, I have
a good knowledge surfing around in windows XP.
There is a myth I heard a lot of times but did not read about it
anywhere, so my question is it true?
The Myth: "If I have folders with files on my desktop my computer
speed goes down because everything on desktop is kept on local memory
for faster indexing. If I want to speed up my memory only icons-
shortcuts can be kept on the desktop, the same issue with my documents
older"
I hope someone will give me the right answer with logical explanation
or some urls.ž
Best regards,
Ashraf Gheith

=======

It's a myth.
Click to expand...

Thank you guys, it have not been logical to me also, but I heard that
more than once from some "experts". So thank you again.
 
NurAzije said:
Hi,
I am not a microsoft certified, I am just a user of windows XP, I have
a good knowledge surfing around in windows XP.
There is a myth I heard a lot of times but did not read about it
anywhere, so my question is it true?
The Myth: "If I have folders with files on my desktop my computer
speed goes down because everything on desktop is kept on local memory
for faster indexing. If I want to speed up my memory only icons-
shortcuts can be kept on the desktop, the same issue with my documents
older"
I hope someone will give me the right answer with logical explanation
or some urls.ž
Best regards,
Ashraf Gheith
Click to expand...

I don't know. I have never even SEEN a folder on the desktop, let alone used
one.

Bad practice. Bad, bad.
 
Hi,

HeyBub wrote;

........I don't know. I have never even SEEN a folder on the desktop, let
alone used one. Bad practice. Bad, bad.

Take a deep breath before looking at a picture of my desktop.

http://jself.com/Desktop.jpg


---==X={}=X==---

Jim Self

AVIATION ANIMATION, the internet's largest depository.
http://avanimation.avsupport.com

Your only internet source for spiral staircase plans.
http://jself.com/stair/Stair.htm

Experimental Aircraft Association #140897
EAA Technical Counselor #4562
 
HeyBub said:
I don't know. I have never even SEEN a folder on the desktop, let alone used
one.

Bad practice. Bad, bad.
Click to expand...

Not necessarily. A folder containing related shortcuts can cut the
clutter considerably. And I drop downloaded files on the desktop
regularly as an easy spot to find them again and eventually delete or
transfer them elsewhere.

But I wonder what Pa20Pilot's "real" desktop looks like? <vbg>

Bill
 
Folders on the desktop can improve operations. As to haaving never seen a
folder on the desktop - meet "Recycle Bin" - a folder without the standard
folder icon.
 
Bob said:
Sorry, but you will find "Recycler" is located in the Root of C: not the
desktop folder.
Click to expand...
Fine, but you still "see" the recycle bin on the desktop.

Bill
 
Bill said:
Fine, but you still "see" the recycle bin on the desktop.

Bill
Click to expand...

You "see" it on the "desktop" same as any other folder "shortcut" the
user wants to place there, the point was to use "shortcuts" to the
folders, not put folders themselves there.
 
Why not put folders there? Its just like putting folders into your My
Documents folder. Both are a subfolder within the Documents and Settings
folder that is just displayed differently for ease of use. And thats exactly
what a folder on the desktop would prove to be, easy access to certain
categorized files.
-kenkcj
 
Except for the fact that the contents of the "Desktop" folder can be
"fiddled" with by the operating system and the "novice user". It was a
bad idea before and still is.
 
Hi BIll,

........But I wonder what Pa20Pilot's "real" desktop looks like?

That picture isn't a joke, that's my real desktop, although it's always
in transition. I don't prefer or plan to make it that way, I just don't
clean house often.


---==X={}=X==---

Jim Self

AVIATION ANIMATION, the internet's largest depository.
http://avanimation.avsupport.com

Your only internet source for spiral staircase plans.
http://jself.com/stair/Stair.htm

Experimental Aircraft Association #140897
EAA Technical Counselor #4562
 
.......But I wonder what Pa20Pilot's "real" desktop looks like?

That picture isn't a joke, that's my real desktop, although it's always
in transition. I don't prefer or plan to make it that way, I just don't
clean house often.
Click to expand...

"often"???? Looks more like never.

I don't have a single icon on my desktop. 20 on my quick launch,
that's it.
 
PD43 said:
"often"???? Looks more like never.

I don't have a single icon on my desktop.
Click to expand...

That's most unfortunate. I have about 40 on mine. You have my
condolences.
 
Bob said:
Except for the fact that the contents of the "Desktop" folder can be
"fiddled" with by the operating system and the "novice user". It was a
bad idea before and still is.
Click to expand...

We don't have no stinkin' "novice users" around here <vbg>.
Been using PC's since 1983, mainframes before that.

Bill
 
PA20Pilot said:
Hi BIll,

.......But I wonder what Pa20Pilot's "real" desktop looks like?

That picture isn't a joke, that's my real desktop, although it's always
in transition. I don't prefer or plan to make it that way, I just don't
clean house often.


---==X={}=X==---

Jim Self
Click to expand...
Jim
No, I believe you. I meant the desktop that the monitor, keyboard, and
mouse sit on. That's "real."
And why do put "wallpaper" on a desktop?

Bill
 
Bill said:
We don't have no stinkin' "novice users" around here <vbg>.
Been using PC's since 1983, mainframes before that.

Bill
Click to expand...

Yep, prefer the command line myself. I'm still amazed at the damage they
can do with a clumsy drag-n-drop!
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

missing desktop files 8
Driving in London! 6
Windows 10 Will Windows 10 be able to run on my PC? 3
what's the story with the FAT32, 32GB limit ? 8
USB Flash (pen) Question 8
XP startup too slow. 6
Freezer Method for Hard Disk Recovery 3
Desktop log on data 2

Back
Top