G
Guest
Hi,
I have a small home network consisting of 4 clients and 1 server (Configured
as a Workgroup). They are all running XP Pro. The server acts as a file,
print, game and internet server. As it is for my family, internal security is
not really a problem. I do however want to protect some folders from my
younger brother. So on the server I have used folder permissions to protect
folders from his user name, and I have done the same to protect him and my
Dad from folders on the clients (eg. Windows dir).
Currently the only way I know how to achieve that is by having 5 separate
user accounts on each machine.
Accounts:
M
R
D
P
Administrator
However, now I have 5 different login names at the Welcome screen and all
the associated folders that come with each profile, not to mention the pain
of going to 5 computers to change a single permission.
All I want is for Client D to boot to windows automatically using D’s
profile, Client M to boot to M etc. I don’t need roaming profiles.
------------
I am trying to set the permissions to do this:
Client D = Admin rights on all machines
Client R = Admin rights on all machines
Client M = Admin rights on self, user rights (read/write) on all machines.
Client P = Admin rights on self, user rights (read/write) on all machines.
Server = Admin rights on all machines
------------
From my various reading on the subject, it seems I need to upgrade my server
to a Domain server. It seems that that is overkill (and expensive) just to
remove users from the log-in screen and centralize permissions handling.
Plus, I don’t think my game’s (Americas Army, RB63, C&C, HL2, Far-Cry)
various server programs work under 2K, NT or 2003.
I had this idea:
I have noticed in the Computer Management>Local Users and
Groups>Groups>*Select Group>Properties>Add> Location> that it asks you to
select a location of the object, but will only let my search the local
machine, not the entire network. Can I do this and thus centralize the whole
process?
In conclusion, is there a better way to do what I am doing?
Thanks for the help,
Bacon
P.S: Sorry about the long post, thought its better to give as much info as
possible.
I have a small home network consisting of 4 clients and 1 server (Configured
as a Workgroup). They are all running XP Pro. The server acts as a file,
print, game and internet server. As it is for my family, internal security is
not really a problem. I do however want to protect some folders from my
younger brother. So on the server I have used folder permissions to protect
folders from his user name, and I have done the same to protect him and my
Dad from folders on the clients (eg. Windows dir).
Currently the only way I know how to achieve that is by having 5 separate
user accounts on each machine.
Accounts:
M
R
D
P
Administrator
However, now I have 5 different login names at the Welcome screen and all
the associated folders that come with each profile, not to mention the pain
of going to 5 computers to change a single permission.
All I want is for Client D to boot to windows automatically using D’s
profile, Client M to boot to M etc. I don’t need roaming profiles.
------------
I am trying to set the permissions to do this:
Client D = Admin rights on all machines
Client R = Admin rights on all machines
Client M = Admin rights on self, user rights (read/write) on all machines.
Client P = Admin rights on self, user rights (read/write) on all machines.
Server = Admin rights on all machines
------------
From my various reading on the subject, it seems I need to upgrade my server
to a Domain server. It seems that that is overkill (and expensive) just to
remove users from the log-in screen and centralize permissions handling.
Plus, I don’t think my game’s (Americas Army, RB63, C&C, HL2, Far-Cry)
various server programs work under 2K, NT or 2003.
I had this idea:
I have noticed in the Computer Management>Local Users and
Groups>Groups>*Select Group>Properties>Add> Location> that it asks you to
select a location of the object, but will only let my search the local
machine, not the entire network. Can I do this and thus centralize the whole
process?
In conclusion, is there a better way to do what I am doing?
Thanks for the help,
Bacon
P.S: Sorry about the long post, thought its better to give as much info as
possible.