MS AntiSpyware vs. SpySweeper

S

Steve

I ran AntiSpyware first using Full System Scan option.

AntiSpyware details:
* 2496 memory location scanned, 0 detected
* 23329 files checked, 0 detected
* 9451 registry locations checked, 0 detected

SpySweeper details:
* 2346 Memory Items Inspected
* 104,517 File/Folders Inspected
* 8735 Registry Items Inspected
* 43 Spy Software Found
* 85 Spy Traces Found
 
D

Dave Neve

Hello

I'd also like to say sth on this issue.

MAS stands for 'Microsoft ANTISPYWARE' with my emphasis on the latter.

What do people who install an antispyware want and what do they expect to
get as suggested in the name?

A software that affords them some form of privacy from Spyware and that must
surely include at least tracking cookies.

MAS also says it clears out the temp Internet file where cookies happen to
be kept.(but apparently isn't made to clear out cookies?!?!?!)

If I had bought this product, I would take it back and ask for a refund.

It doesn't do what it says it has done nor what one might expect it to do.

Regards

Dave Neve
 
A

Andre Da Costa

Please read this Dave:
"Tracking" Cookies in Anti-Spyware Applications
posted Wednesday, February 23, 2005 12:07 PM by stevedod
As a user of many anti-spyware applications over the years, one item has
always bothered me when removed by antispyware applications. That item is
"tracking" cookies. Many people in the industry know what cookies are, and
how they can be used, but I do not think my parents would know anything
about cookies. In my opinion, the industry has created a scare tactic in
order to make a "problem" seem worse than it really is. I see this a lot
when people are reporting that one program is better than another in respect
to cookies. I really do not see how someone can make that argument. I can
write a program which deletes n+1 files if I want until I reach a point
where there are no more files to delete.
So why is this a problem?? Users do not know what files are good or bad, and
therefore rely on the application to determine this for them. But if I am
the programmer for another application, I could delete all good and bad
files and then say... " We delete more files than Product X." The end user
then says... "Of course..I want the other product...more is better!!" These
users will then end up losing some settings which were never malicious in
the first place. This leads me to the last thought...
Cookies by themselves are not malicious; they are text files with settings.
Cookies can be a part of some application which calls on the text file in
order to send information to a 3rd party, but end the end, they are only
text files. In order for "tracking" cookies to be of use, a corresponding
application needs to be running in the background and grab information off
this file. I think this is where anti-spyware applications need to be
focusing their efforts - removal of the application which uses these text
files instead of blowing away all good and bad cookies.
I think the cookie argument will go on for a while, but as long as the end
user cannot discern what is good versus what is bad, the industry needs to
work on improving the logic of removing applications as opposed to deleting
all cookies.
--
Andre
Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
 
S

Steve

Thanks for pointing out the article by stevedod.

I guess I can repeat my question posted to Mr/Ms "Monitor".

How will we, as end users, get that sense of protection ?

Steve
 
S

Steve

Also, "Full System Scan" option does not mean that every
single file in the C drive is to be scanned, right ??

According to the numbers, "Full System Scan" scanned only
23 thousand files out of 100+ thousand files. Was that a
bug or the intended result ??

Steve
 
A

Andre Da Costa

Did you check the boxes below Full System Scan?
--
Andre
Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm

Also, "Full System Scan" option does not mean that every
single file in the C drive is to be scanned, right ??

According to the numbers, "Full System Scan" scanned only
23 thousand files out of 100+ thousand files. Was that a
bug or the intended result ??

Steve
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top