P
paulmd
"Minimum requirements for basic Vista include an 800 GHz or faster CPU
and 512MB of RAM."
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/ZDM/story?id=1977797
and 512MB of RAM."
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/ZDM/story?id=1977797
Trax said:|>"Minimum requirements for basic Vista include an 800 GHz or faster CPU
|>and 512MB of RAM."
|>
|>http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/ZDM/story?id=1977797
Vista upgrade advisor (kinda early one would think)
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/getready/upgradeadvisor/default.mspx
Direct link to file VistaUpgradeAdvisor.msi
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=65926&clcid=0x409
You have to actually install it...
"Minimum requirements for basic Vista include an 800 GHz or faster CPU
and 512MB of RAM."
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/ZDM/story?id=1977797
Anyone got an 800 Gigahertz CPU???
John said:Obviously a typo on the ABC News website.
The Microsoft website says 800MHz, which seems a reasonable requirement
for a barebones Vista experience albeit it won't run Aero (as I understand
it).
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/getready/systemrequirements.mspx
Seems that today's entry level 3GHz+ with 1GHz RAM and 100GB+ hard drive
machines should be OK for Vista + Aero.
Gordon said:I wonder why MS concentrates on BLOAT rather than EFFICIENCY?
Pegasus said:What's bloated about 800 MHz?
Gordon said:Nothing - I was commenting on the required disk space.......
John said:What makes you think they're not focused on efficiency?
Davy said:Wonder how many patches this time.. and how many problems like the Xp
patches created...?
Davy
Davy said:Wonder how many patches this time.. and how many problems like the Xp
patches created...?
Davy
Pegasus said:These days the cost of hard disk space is around $1.00 per GByte,
Vista would therefore consume about $20.00 worth of disk space.
DOS required about 5 MBytes which cost around $20.00 back in
1987. Seeing that you are into accounting, do you see a big issue
here?
kurttrail said:The answer is to my estimation, is that MS OS's get more and more
bloated due to the fact that they try to make each one compatible with
old technology. Making sure that the Wheel 1.0 still works.
These days the cost of hard disk space is around $1.00 per GByte,
Vista would therefore consume about $20.00 worth of disk space.
DOS required about 5 MBytes which cost around $20.00 back in
1987. Seeing that you are into accounting, do you see a big issue
here?
Gordon said:Pegasus (MVP) wrote:
Nothing - I was commenting on the required disk space.......
Gordon said:Pegasus (MVP) wrote:
Yes. It's nothing to do with the cost of disk space but all to do with
sloppy and inefficient coding! If you run an OS like (say) Windows 95 on a
modern 3 GHz processor with 1GB RAM it will ABSOLUTELY BLAZE along. OK so
W95 wasn't a particularly good OS, but even W2K in many people's eyes is
faster than XP on the same hardware because the code isn't as bloated and
is more efficient. To extrapolate, look at the hugely intricate programs
that ran on mainframes, using only 640k of memory! Just because huge
amounts of memory and disk space are now available does NOT mean the
programmers HAVE to use all the available space!
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.