Modern Processors and Gaming - Do Ghz matter?

Joined
Jan 6, 2006
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Without Spilling into the whole Intel Vs AMD debate I was wondering just how important the raw speed of a processor is and how relevant buying a processor now is for gaming in the future...

AMD processors have a lower clock Ghz speed than most Intel processors. From what I understand AMD processors are superior for gaming but with games going to breaking into the 2 GHz mark as a minimum requirement does this mean that while AMD processors preform better, Intels are more future proof due to their high clock speed??

I'm probably being really dumb :)confused:) but for all those (including myself) who may be thinking of buying a computer for gaming, getting a good and future proof computer this may prove valuable.

P.S hope the thread doesn't develop into a slanging match between Intel and AMD fanboys!! :p

Thanks for any replies
 

muckshifter

I'm not weird, I'm a limited edition.
Moderator
Joined
Mar 5, 2002
Messages
25,739
Reaction score
1,204
It really doesn't matter anymore ...

Just buy the best you can afford no matter who makes it ... though I try and stick above 500cc's

:thumb:
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2005
Messages
1,934
Reaction score
0
future proofing is no longer a viable buying point of the athlon 64's. Reason being Intel's line of new cpu's are coming out over the next 6 months, and i would presume they have 64 capabilities.
 

Reefsmoka

Cookie Monster
Joined
May 21, 2004
Messages
1,946
Reaction score
10
I used to be an Intel addict, loved em. Then I went AMD64 and Intel never entered my mind again ;).

AMD processors run alot cooler which helps in games as your computer is less likely to shut itself down during heavy gaming :p.
 

floppybootstomp

sugar 'n spikes
Moderator
Joined
Mar 5, 2002
Messages
20,281
Reaction score
1,794
Nah, come on, let's have a slagging match between AMD & Intel, it's so much fun :p

Cache! Hyperthreading! Bottlenecks! True fsb! Temperature! Real time benchmarks!

That should get y'all started :D

I figure that, as of now, if you have either an AMD 64 bit CPU minimum speed 2.2Ghz or a pentium chip of around 3.2Ghz then your gaming experience will be dependent on other factors - motherboard, graphics card, memory.

And FWIW - Intel suck :p
 
Joined
May 18, 2004
Messages
6,738
Reaction score
102
My trusty 2.8GHz Northie is going fine! Works a treat.

Overclocks to 3.4GHz, got Hyperthreading, and all that jazz - and was out way before the A64.

Now A64 is out, i dont think i would have another intel.

BUT

That dosent mean intel are BAD, just they arent as good :D
 

floppybootstomp

sugar 'n spikes
Moderator
Joined
Mar 5, 2002
Messages
20,281
Reaction score
1,794
christopherpostill said:
My trusty 2.8GHz Northie is going fine! Works a treat.

Overclocks to 3.4GHz, got Hyperthreading, and all that jazz - and was out way before the A64.

Now A64 is out, i dont think i would have another intel.

BUT

That dosent mean intel are BAD, just they arent as good :D

Would you please stop talking sensible and rise to the bait :p
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2005
Messages
1,934
Reaction score
0
figures speak for themselves.

yesterday AMD shares were worth $33

Intel were worth only $25
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top