A
Andrew Sadleir
Knowledge Base Article 174619 describes reservation of
disk space for the MFT, as applicable to Windows 2000 and
Windows NT.
How is MFT space reservation implemented for NTFS under
Windows XP Pro? Running such a system (as a standalone
home/office PC), I note that my MFT is fragmented
(according to Windows Defrag), although this comes as
something of a surprise, given that my 114GB disk is only
about 10% full, this being about the maximum utilisation
throughout its service life.
Could this fragmentation be the result of under-
reservation, or is a certain degree of MFT fragmentation
considered 'normal' under the conditions described? I am
not currently aware of any direct consequences on
performance, but would obviously prefer to limit further
fragmentation, if possible. Availability of disk space is
not an issue, so I could afford to reserve or even
exclusively allocate generous space for the MFT.
I should say that I am about to replace the hard drive,
which is exhibiting erratic CHKDSK results, and has been
confirmed as faulty by the Manufacturer's own diagnostic
software. It is, of course, possible, that MFT
fragmentation has been a consequence of the drive
degradation. However, I would like to take the opportunity
to optimise all parameters when reinstalling my C: volume
on the new drive (which will be essentially the same
specification as the original). In particular, does the
zone reservation run-time registry parameter, as described
in KB174619 for NT4.0 SP4, have a counterpart for use with
XP Pro?
disk space for the MFT, as applicable to Windows 2000 and
Windows NT.
How is MFT space reservation implemented for NTFS under
Windows XP Pro? Running such a system (as a standalone
home/office PC), I note that my MFT is fragmented
(according to Windows Defrag), although this comes as
something of a surprise, given that my 114GB disk is only
about 10% full, this being about the maximum utilisation
throughout its service life.
Could this fragmentation be the result of under-
reservation, or is a certain degree of MFT fragmentation
considered 'normal' under the conditions described? I am
not currently aware of any direct consequences on
performance, but would obviously prefer to limit further
fragmentation, if possible. Availability of disk space is
not an issue, so I could afford to reserve or even
exclusively allocate generous space for the MFT.
I should say that I am about to replace the hard drive,
which is exhibiting erratic CHKDSK results, and has been
confirmed as faulty by the Manufacturer's own diagnostic
software. It is, of course, possible, that MFT
fragmentation has been a consequence of the drive
degradation. However, I would like to take the opportunity
to optimise all parameters when reinstalling my C: volume
on the new drive (which will be essentially the same
specification as the original). In particular, does the
zone reservation run-time registry parameter, as described
in KB174619 for NT4.0 SP4, have a counterpart for use with
XP Pro?