memtest86 - need help with results

  • Thread starter Thread starter Richard Fangnail
  • Start date Start date
R

Richard Fangnail

I just ran memtest86. I wasn't able to run the whole thing but in the
middle row (near the right), there were over 600 errors found. On the
bottom half of the screen, there were red lines of text listing which
test (#5) and failing address.

I also read that just one error means you have a problem, is that
right?

I don't need the smallest details, but does this mean my RAM is bad,
and would it explain why my browsers have been crashing?

Is there anything I can do about the problem? You can't fix RAM the
way you can run a chkdsk.
(I have 512M by the way).
 
Microsoft memory tester tests both the ram & the controller,if any errors
are detected in any test then on next pc shutdown,one would switch the ram
around & re-run the test..The next test gives indications as to what & where
the problem is..With only 512mb of ram,purchase another memory ram of
same type,run the test..512mb is a min. amount in xp,youre purchase would
justify itself...Also,any ram test should run w/o a error.
 
I just ran memtest86. I wasn't able to run the whole thing but in the
middle row (near the right), there were over 600 errors found. On the
bottom half of the screen, there were red lines of text listing which
test (#5) and failing address.

I also read that just one error means you have a problem, is that
right?

I don't need the smallest details, but does this mean my RAM is bad,
and would it explain why my browsers have been crashing?

Is there anything I can do about the problem? You can't fix RAM the
way you can run a chkdsk.
(I have 512M by the way).

Although not as accurate as professional high tech RAM tests, if it's
reporting as many errors as you state then most likely your RAM is
corrupt.bad. I suggest purchasing new modules for your exact
manufacturer/make/model PC, modules have come down quite considerably in
price.

Look up memory modules for your PC here:
http://www.crucial.com/

--

Brian A. Sesko
Conflicts start where information lacks.
http://basconotw.mvps.org/

Suggested posting do's/don'ts: http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
How to ask a question: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
 
Most likely memtest86+ is a good indicator of failing ram.
If its not a home built PC and is a store bought PC then
it's even more likely its bad ram.

But some things you can do:
1) Remove the case cover and blow out the
dust bunnies.
2) Check your case fans, are they all spinning?
3) Remove and reseat the memory sticks. (Note: remove
the AC power cord and wait at least 5 minutes before
removing the ram).

Then run memtest86+ again. If memtest passes then
download and run 'Prime95' (just the Stress Test option)
http://majorgeeks.com/Prime95_d4363.html

If your PC can pass this test after running for 3 to 6 hours
your good to go, if it still fails (with memory problems, usually
fails within the first 20 minutes or so) then it either hardware or
your memory.
 
Richard said:
I just ran memtest86. I wasn't able to run the whole thing but in the
middle row (near the right), there were over 600 errors found. On the
bottom half of the screen, there were red lines of text listing which
test (#5) and failing address.

I also read that just one error means you have a problem, is that
right?

I don't need the smallest details, but does this mean my RAM is bad,
and would it explain why my browsers have been crashing?

Is there anything I can do about the problem? You can't fix RAM the
way you can run a chkdsk.
(I have 512M by the way).

Yes, 1 error is 1 error too many. You don't want any errors with
memtest86+ from memtest.org . Memtest86+ is actually an easy test
to pass, so if you're seeing errors, you're not in good shape. There
are actually other tests, such as Prime95, which are more sensitive
tests of proper computer function. But save Prime95 for later,
as memtest86+ is the test you want to conquer right now.

http://www.mersenne.org/freesoft/ (Version 25.9 is multithreaded)

If the number of errors in the entire pass is small (like a couple
errors), then sometimes increasing the DIMM voltage setting in the
BIOS helps. But that is typically an option on an enthusiast retail
motherboard, rather than something you find universally available
as an option.

Test #5 is where errors are typically detected. If the errors scroll
by very fast, that can mean an entire chip is bad (I had one like that).

If you have more than one stick of RAM, you can test the RAM one
stick at a time.

To work with RAM, you need an antistatic bag. That is to store
the RAM, between tests. You need to remove all power from the
PC, before adding or removing sticks of RAM. (I unplug the
power cord, as a way to remind myself there is no power present.)

If you test the sticks one at a time, you may get a better idea of
which one is bad.

For more specific help, it would be nice to know the make and model
of computer, or if you built the computer yourself, the make and
model of motherboard. The processor choice, and number, size, and
speed of RAM sticks, will add to the picture of your system.

You've done some good testing, trying to identify a software
problem. But now all your software tests are invalidated, as
it turns out you have bad RAM. Once the RAM is fixed, you're going to
have to rerun all the "problem" test cases, such as visiting
wunderground.com with Firefox.

Paul
 
Richard said:
I just ran memtest86. I wasn't able to run the whole thing but in the
middle row (near the right), there were over 600 errors found. On the
bottom half of the screen, there were red lines of text listing which
test (#5) and failing address.

I also read that just one error means you have a problem, is that
right?

I don't need the smallest details, but does this mean my RAM is bad,
and would it explain why my browsers have been crashing?

Is there anything I can do about the problem? You can't fix RAM the
way you can run a chkdsk.
(I have 512M by the way).

Now you're getting somewhere Richard. If your system is very old, it
may not be worth while to throw good money at it.

Also too, information written to your HDD through failing RAM may
yield corrupt data, and probably the only reasonable cure is to
flatten & rebuild /after/ the RAM situation is resolved.

Tell these folks /exactly/ what your system consists of and
approximately how old the system is.

BTW. This post probably should have been made in
microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware. I too am curious as to why you
chose memtest86 over memtest86+

Regards,

Pete
 
Richard Fangnail said:
I just ran memtest86. I wasn't able to run the whole thing but in the
middle row (near the right), there were over 600 errors found. On the
bottom half of the screen, there were red lines of text listing which
test (#5) and failing address.


It's interesting that "1PW" suggested that you run memtest86+ way back on
July 7. Funny that you are only now getting around to running it. See how
much time you have saved by running it later instead of sooner?
 
Hi everybody!

After the memtest gave me so many errors, I decided to buy a new
(Vista) computer. It hasn't crashed.

I certainly learned a lof from the experience.
 
Richard said:
Hi everybody!

After the memtest gave me so many errors, I decided to buy a new
(Vista) computer. It hasn't crashed.

I certainly learned a lof from the experience.

Hello Richard:

What will you do to protect your new computer from malware. Most
systems come with links to security suites that many believe are under
protection at best.

What is the brand/model number for your new system? What version of
Vista is installed?

Regards,

Pete
 
Richard said:
Hi everybody!

After the memtest gave me so many errors, I decided to buy a new
(Vista) computer. It hasn't crashed.

I certainly learned a lof from the experience.

The tread on my tires is too low. I think I'll purchase a new car...

What a "lof"...
 
Richard said:
Hi everybody!

After the memtest gave me so many errors, I decided to buy a new
(Vista) computer. It hasn't crashed.

I certainly learned a lof from the experience.

When you decide you don't like Vista, you're always
welcome to come back and get more help to replace
the RAM in your current computer :-)

Paul
 
Daave said:
The tread on my tires is too low. I think I'll purchase a new car...

What a "lof"...

Hello to All:

Since we never received a definitive description of Richard's system,
he might have just replaced a P2-600 for all we know. However, at
some later time, the old system /might/ be made operational (if
economical) and turned into a nifty Linux based server.

Warm regards to all,

Pete
 
Hi everybody!
After the memtest gave me so many errors, I decided to buy a new
(Vista) computer. It hasn't crashed.

I certainly learned a lof from the experience.

If you're in the US how about sending me your other PC and I'll get new
memory for it. I'll even pay the shipping and it will still cost me far
less than purchasing a new PC.

--

Brian A. Sesko
Conflicts start where information lacks.
http://basconotw.mvps.org/

Suggested posting do's/don'ts: http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
How to ask a question: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
 
Brian A. said:
If you're in the US how about sending me your other PC and I'll get new
memory for it. I'll even pay the shipping and it will still cost me far
less than purchasing a new PC.

--

Brian A. Sesko
Conflicts start where information lacks.
http://basconotw.mvps.org/

Suggested posting do's/don'ts: http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
How to ask a question: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375


Well if was a P2-600 ...... it was time for a new computer.

One thing that could have been checked was the timing for the ram chips
(RAS, CAS.......) I have Corsair memory and they spec some very low numbers
for timing, I set in BIOS those settings and ran my computer and it seeemed
to work fine. Then I ran memtest 86+ and it failed some of the tests so I
went back into BIOS and icreased the first number from 2 to 2.5, them reran
the memtest program. The failed tests were gone and everything has been
running fine since then.

Shaun
 
Back
Top