The folks at Microsoft are working towards making Windows safer "out of the
box" (ala SP2 and the Windows Firewall turned on by default), but it is not
the responsibility of MS to hold the hand of each and every person who buys
it's software. One is not allowed to drive a vehicle (in most states) until
one is "mature" enough to do so, and can demonstrate certain basic knowledge
about "rules of the road". I believe the same should be true of owning a
computer that one intends to connect to the internet. Ignorance is no
excuse...nor is laziness or simply a laksidaisical attitude.
Your example isn't accurate. The car makers go to great lengths to
insure that their cars are indeed safe to drive. When they make a
mistake, they have a recall, and it is a big deal. Windows is
unsafe to operate in its default configuration -- if you use it as
intended right after installation, you will get viruses and
trojans. Your computer will be "owned" by some 13-year old kid
with pimples.
Windows is truly no more prone to viruses and worms than any other
operating system (despite what the Mac and*nix folks will tell you). It
just happens to be instilled on 98% of the computers used in the home, and
about 70% of the computers used in a business environment. Virus and worms
writers attack windows because "it is there". If *nix was the predominant
OS, or the MAC OS, then they would be the ones that would be "attacked".
This is a pretty broad statement to make, and unsupported by the
evidence. I think that the Mac OS and Linus OS are indeed,
inherently safer to use, and the lack of Linux and Mac viruses
suggests the same. How much of the difference in the number of
viruses between Linux and Windows is to do the market share of
Windows, nobody can say, other than to guess, or make unsupported
assertions.
I challenge you to write 11 million lines of code (the approximate size
of Windows XP), and have it work on every machine on which it is installed,
every time, with no hitches. Once that obstacle is achieved, I would
challenge you to make it invulnerable to hacking, viruses, worms, and such.
It cannot be done. There are some very creative people writing malicious
code out there.
Sure, I agree, making Windows save for users is a nightmare. At
least Microsoft is making some attempt at fixing the problem.
You. like so many others, want to take the easy road and hope that MS will
take care of all of the problems that arise. It will not happen.
I want Microsoft to sell an operating system that is safe to use,
in the intended way, right out of the box, without the user being
forced to download supplemental programs, or make extensive
configuration changes. I don't think that is unreasonable.
We must all act responsibly when we connect to the internet. We cannot
expect anyone else to do this for us. We owe it to ourselves, and everyone
else on the 'net, to be responsible and act accordingly...exactly the same
as we should keep our cars maintained, should not pile flammable materials
near our stoves and heaters, etc.
Users bear a responsibility not to download and run malware on
their computers. Microsoft bears the responsibility not to sell an
OS that is configured and designed to be unsafe to use.
You can't just cop out and blame it on MS.
I do blame Microsoft, and I don't see it as a cop out in any way.