Justin is really nothing more than another zealot

[DanS]

HAHAHAH!!! Suuuuure! whatever-you-say. If you think that's resource
intensive you are a smalltime user.

So the CPU usage of PSP going to 85-90% for 6 or 8 seconds while it's doing
the 'One Step Photo Touchup' is not resource intensive ?

OK, if you insist, but it STILL doesn't change the fact that F@H was using
the CPU, the yielded it to PSP.

 

[DanS]

You read all threads? Yeah right. I don't care what you see. So far
I've not seen you help anyone. That doesn't mean you don't. See how
that works?

Not hard to read through all the threads. I never claimed I was here to
help anyone.

 

[Leythos]

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:24:52 -0700, Justin wrote:
[snip drivel]

What was your dumb point again?

That you act/present yourself as a Zealot and troll.

 

[DanS]

Wrong again! There are a few that will chime in. How about you adam?
No one has defended you in this thread. I know, you feel lonely so
you feel the need to impose loneliness on others. It's typical.
Especially for an old lonely fart such as yourself.

I have seen a couple Adam posts here since this thread started of him
actually trying to legitimately help out....unlike you.

 

[Adam Albright]

Nope! Wrong again! You where never meant to use any of the reader specific
links. Just the text. You know that and I know you know that. It's ok.
You can keep lying and I can keep clearing it up. You'll die soon anyway
then the world will be a better place. Something to look forward to.

How can you be so stupid day in and day out? Oh, I forgot, I'm having
a discussion with Justin, he's always this stupid. LOL!

In the same thread you've now said here is a link, follow it and oh,
this isn't a link, you know it isn't. Which story you want to run with
today, doofus?

Your main problem is you can't keep your lies straight. I've noticed.
That's a common problem for liars. If you simply stuck to the truth
you wouldn't have so many problems trying to defend your halfass
comments which always jump up and take a bite out of you.

Priceless!

 

[Adam Albright]

Wrong again! There are a few that will chime in. How about you adam? No
one has defended you in this thread. I know, you feel lonely so you feel
the need to impose loneliness on others. It's typical. Especially for an
old lonely fart such as yourself.

I don't need anybody to restate the FACTS. You keep changing your
story. That's your track record. Scroll up and look at the title of
this thread. You're known as a foaming from the mouth wild eyed
Microsoft zealot, yet you go on and on pretending you're not.

Such entertainment, and totally free. Never stop being you kid. Your
priceless.

 

[Adam Albright]

Oh ok, so then NO OS EVER has EVER been ready. Got any other brilliant
thoughts for us to ponder?



Sure it was. The bugs are not serious.

Here you go again moving the goal posts. That's what you do. You start
out saying Vista is ready. I bring up the fact YOU were the one that
claimed Vista shipped with 500 known bugs. You again being caught in
your own bullshit being unable to defend your laughable dual positions
at the same time that mean exact opposites saying both Vista is ready
and Vista has 500 bugs which proves it isn't ready, now say, oh those
bugs, not serious. You're just a idiot and keep proving it.

ROTFLMAO!

 

[Justin]

Give ONE example of you doing that. Post the link here =====>

You want one? You got one:

I stand corrected. That's a better idea. I didn't even know there was a
status. Thanks DevilsPGD

So adam, once again you've made yourself look like a complete a-hole. You
never answered the question. How does it feel to be so wrong so often?

 

[Justin]

So the CPU usage of PSP going to 85-90% for 6 or 8 seconds while it's
doing
the 'One Step Photo Touchup' is not resource intensive ?

OK, if you insist, but it STILL doesn't change the fact that F@H was using
the CPU, the yielded it to PSP.

With that client set the way it was. Yup, that's right.

 

[Justin]

I have seen a couple Adam posts here since this thread started of him
actually trying to legitimately help out....unlike you.

Then you continue to prove just how blind you are. I took a break from you
idiots.

 

[Justin]

I don't need anybody to restate the FACTS. You keep changing your
story. That's your track record. Scroll up and look at the title of
this thread. You're known as a foaming from the mouth wild eyed
Microsoft zealot, yet you go on and on pretending you're not.

Such entertainment, and totally free. Never stop being you kid. Your
priceless.

Here's a FACT, I never changed my story.

You changed the story in your decrepit mind. You're just an old f@ck who's
life is running out and you've got nothing better to do then spit and hiss
to make up for your life's shortcomings.

Foaming at the mouth? Your delusional as well. Thanks for the laughs old
man!!!

 

[Justin]

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:24:52 -0700, Justin wrote:
[snip drivel]

What was your dumb point again?

That you act/present yourself as a Zealot and troll.

Classic bypass! Typical way to not address the issue. What's the mater,
you have no way to backup your claims?

ALL OS' have bugs. Bugs that get fixed over years of time. ALL OF THEM.
Yet you and adam make claims that they should be perfect. Based on what?
No OS' ever has been perfect out of the gate.

The fact is, you both know how wrong you are and this entire charade is to
mask that fact.

 

[Justin]

Not hard to read through all the threads. I never claimed I was here to
help anyone.

I never said you did but it's good to know you completely misunderstood the
point.

 

[Justin]

Nope. Here's the post that you made that you were 'corrected' on later.

http://groups.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=#MhziYQYHHA.596
@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl

Here is the full contents of that post.


If your drive is constantly active without doing anything then it's mostly
likely building an index.

If you want to test it then you can turn the indexing service off.

Very good, now grab someone with at least a 6th grade education to help you
out. In the meantime I'll give you some clues.

You stated:
"It couldn't mean that a database is being backed up, or someone is copying
a large file the server"

You already know that's not true because:
"without doing anything"
"mostly likely"

Then of course there's the fail safe:
"If you want to test it then"

Now put aside at least an hour or two and think as hard as possible. Also
note where the original question was coming from. You have a REAL BAD habit
of not qualifying the person before making wild ASSumptions.

 

[DanS]

With that client set the way it was. Yup, that's right.

Yes, with the client set to use 100%, disable 'Highly Optimized Machine
Code', and accept project > 5Megs. Just as it is shown in the video using
the GUI client.

 

[DanS]

Classic bypass! Typical way to not address the issue. What's the
mater, you have no way to backup your claims?

Bypass what ? The issua at hand is in the thread subject.

NONE has byassed THAT issue.

ALL OS' have bugs. Bugs that get fixed over years of time. ALL OF
THEM. Yet you and adam make claims that they should be perfect. Based
on what? No OS' ever has been perfect out of the gate.

Of course, the biggest bug Vista has right now is network file
manipulations. And this bug is a MAJOR productivity hit.

Even you can not dispute this.

 

[Justin]

Yes, with the client set to use 100%, disable 'Highly Optimized Machine
Code', and accept project > 5Megs. Just as it is shown in the video using
the GUI client.

It's ok. You'll never get it. I've already accepted that.

 

[Leythos]

Classic bypass! Typical way to not address the issue. What's the
mater, you have no way to backup your claims?

ALL OS' have bugs. Bugs that get fixed over years of time. ALL OF
THEM. Yet you and adam make claims that they should be perfect. Based
on what? No OS' ever has been perfect out of the gate.

The fact is, you both know how wrong you are and this entire charade is
to mask that fact.

The only one playing a game is you.

If the OS, according to you, has enough bugs that it performs marginally
on a base install, and performs marginally with updated drivers, then it's
not a problem with me or my hardware - it IS a Vista Problem.

The real issue of this thread is that you are clearly a troll and a MS can
do no wrong Zealot - just look at your rantings.

 

[Justin]

Bypass what ? The issua at hand is in the thread subject.

NONE has byassed THAT issue.

Wow, once again you are so completely lost. Is your news reader acting up
again? Here you go:

Like it or not, without ANY drivers it would be worthless. They just
rushed the release and people suffer for it.

Ok, let's ASSume your right.

If that's the case then:

1. Windows 95 was rushed.
2. Windows 98 was rushed.
3. Windows ME was rushed.
4. Windows 2000 was rushed.
5. Windows XP was rushed.
6. Windows 2003 was rushed.
7. Ugh...ALL distros of linux were rushed.
8. MAC OS - OSX where rushed.

Are you up to speed yet?

Of course, the biggest bug Vista has right now is network file
manipulations. And this bug is a MAJOR productivity hit.

For some. I do not experience this issue. Also, isn't there a hotfix for
this?

Even you can not dispute this.

I never dispute valid verified bugs. You think I do but that only proves
more of your ignorance.

 

[Justin]

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:24:52 -0700, Justin wrote: [snip drivel]
What was your dumb point again?

That you act/present yourself as a Zealot and troll.

Classic bypass! Typical way to not address the issue. What's the
mater, you have no way to backup your claims?

ALL OS' have bugs. Bugs that get fixed over years of time. ALL OF
THEM. Yet you and adam make claims that they should be perfect. Based
on what? No OS' ever has been perfect out of the gate.

The fact is, you both know how wrong you are and this entire charade is
to mask that fact.

The only one playing a game is you.

If the OS, according to you, has enough bugs that it performs marginally
on a base install, and performs marginally with updated drivers, then it's
not a problem with me or my hardware - it IS a Vista Problem.

A Vista bug is a Vista problem? Wow, I hope that thought didn't take long.

That still doesn't mean it doesn’t belong on the shelves. Going back to
your original gripe and not this new spin off to distract from how wrong you
where....Again , if MS waited for ALL drivers they would never have an OS to
release.

The real issue of this thread is that you are clearly a troll and a MS can
do no wrong Zealot - just look at your rantings.

Hahahaha!!! It's amazing how blind you trolls can be. You claim I think MS
can do no wrong even after I get done discussing bugs? LLMF

The simple fact of the mater is you expect people to claim that MS should
have never released Vista. You are wrong. Period. No amount of your
blabber is ever going to change my or anyone else's view on that. MS is UP
in profit thanks to Vista even after a VERY BAD round in the console market.

I know, you're pissed because you can’t get Vista to run better then XP.
We've already discovered why and you are too stubborn to do anything about
it. You want to sit in a corner sulking that the you absolutely MUST be
able to use the drivers and ONLY THE DRIVERS on the Windows DVD. Well, good
for you.