ISO Burner

[Mayayana]

| That's for the later versions of .NET after 2.0, as I recall.
| At least if you stick with .NET 2.0 or NET 1.1 apps, the added net runtime
| file sizes aren't too bad!
| I think most people can get by with just .NET 2 and .NET 1.1. And some
| would argue they don't even need those (even though they're minimal
| installers).
|
Yes, v. 2 seems to be a workable compromise for
people who need .Net. After v. 2 Visual Studio has
incorporated the ability to continue writing v. 2
software -- because of the giant dependency of v. 3
and because v. 3 hasn't been as widely distributed --
so v. 2 seems to be what most .Net software uses.

 

[Bob Willard]

Per Peter Foldes:

I'll meet your OT and raise it with the eight-hundred bucks I
paid to get a 20-meg hard drive on my first MacIntosh.

My first programming course was taught on ILLIAC-I, a supercomputer of
its time. It had a 64KB HD (a drum) to supplement its 5KB of RAM.

Both the CPU and the RAM glowed in the dark: the CPU's glow came from
the filaments of its 2800 vacuum tubes, and the RAM's glow came from a
slave CRT; the 1KBx40 RAM was based on 40 CRTs, where each CRT held a
bit-slice as an array of 32x32 dots.