Intel raid or Promise raid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anthony So
  • Start date Start date
A

Anthony So

My motherboard is Asus P4P800E Deluxe, running Windows XP pro SP2.
the motherboard has build-in Intel chipset ICH5R support SATA raid function.
But it also has a build-in Promise Fastack 378 SATA raid controller.

I have 2 SATA harddisks and planning to run raid 0 mode. Which SATA should I
use?
Intel or Promise, which one is faster, better?
 
RAID (redundant array of independent disks; originally redundant array of
inexpensive disks) is a way of storing the same data in different places
(thus, redundantly) on multiple hard disks. By placing data on multiple
disks, I/O operations can overlap in a balanced way, improving performance.
Since multiple disks increases the mean time between failure (MTBF), storing
data redundantly also increases fault-tolerance.

A RAID appears to the operating system to be a single logical hard disk.
RAID employs the technique of striping, which involves partitioning each
drive's storage space into units ranging from a sector (512 bytes) up to
several megabytes. The stripes of all the disks are interleaved and addressed
in order.

In a single-user system where large records, such as medical or other
scientific images, are stored, the stripes are typically set up to be small
(perhaps 512 bytes) so that a single record spans all disks and can be
accessed quickly by reading all disks at the same time.

In a multi-user system, better performance requires establishing a stripe
wide enough to hold the typical or maximum size record. This allows
overlapped disk I/O across drives.

There are at least nine types of RAID plus a non-redundant array (RAID-0):

RAID-0. This technique has striping but no redundancy of data. It offers the
best performance but no fault-tolerance.

Given the above, there is little to choose between various chips sets. Does
the manufacturer show a preference for RAID 0 with 2 HDDs in the user
manual. They must have some reason for providing two chips sets.
 
My motherboard is Asus P4P800E Deluxe, running Windows XP pro SP2.
the motherboard has build-in Intel chipset ICH5R support SATA raid
function.
But it also has a build-in Promise Fastack 378 SATA raid controller.

I have 2 SATA harddisks and planning to run raid 0 mode. Which SATA should
I use?
Intel or Promise, which one is faster, better?

I have a GB 8KNXP with the same chipset and a Sil3112 in lieu of your
Promise controller. When I installed my RAID0 I asked for advice like
you're doing and the consensus was to use the on-chip ICH5R over the
on-board controller (Silicon Image in my case, Promise in yours). The
reasoning was that the ICH5R taxed the PCI bus less than the on-board
variant.
 
It is faster to use the Intel on board chip for raid since the data
accesses the Southbridge chip directly giving you a higher amount of data
transfer speeds. This question was answered in a recent issue of Maximum
PC.

Hope this helps....
John
 
It is faster to use the Intel on board chip for raid since the data
accesses the Southbridge chip directly giving you a higher amount of data
transfer speeds. This question was answered in a recent issue of Maximum
PC.

I'm saving your comments so the next time I reply to this question I'll
state it more succinctly. Thanks.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Back
Top