[INFECTED] Bible Seeker

[Frank Bohan]

Bible Seeker, which was mentioned in ACF some time ago, is infected with a
virus.

http://www.all4you.dk/FreewareWorld/links.php?id=12573

===

Frank Bohan
¶ I didn't reach the top of the food chain by being a vegetarian.

 

[badgolferman]

Frank Bohan, 5/23/2006, 12:12:35 PM,

Bible Seeker, which was mentioned in ACF some time ago, is infected
with a virus.

http://www.all4you.dk/FreewareWorld/links.php?id=12573

What virus? Have you submitted it to Virus Total to make sure?
http://www.virustotal.com/en/indexf.html

 

[badgolferman]

badgolferman, 5/23/2006, 12:32:27 PM,

Frank Bohan, 5/23/2006, 12:12:35 PM,



What virus? Have you submitted it to Virus Total to make sure?
http://www.virustotal.com/en/indexf.html

As a courtesy I have included the results of a virus scan for the Bible
program. Bob, you may want to change your AV program.
-------------------------------

STATUS: FINISHEDComplete scanning result of "bblskr.exe", received in
VirusTotal at 05.23.2006, 18:49:05 (CET).

Antivirus Version Update Result
AntiVir 6.34.1.27 05.23.2006 no virus found
Authentium 4.93.8 05.22.2006 no virus found
Avast 4.6.695.0 05.23.2006 no virus found
AVG 386 05.22.2006 no virus found
BitDefender 7.2 05.23.2006 no virus found
CAT-QuickHeal 8.00 05.23.2006 no virus found
ClamAV devel-20060426 05.22.2006 no virus found
DrWeb 4.33 05.23.2006 no virus found
eTrust-InoculateIT 23.72.15 05.23.2006 no virus found
eTrust-Vet 12.4.2224 05.23.2006 no virus found
Ewido 3.5 05.23.2006 no virus found
Fortinet 2.77.0.0 05.23.2006 no virus found
F-Prot 3.16c 05.22.2006 no virus found
Ikarus 0.2.65.0 05.23.2006 no virus found
Kaspersky 4.0.2.24 05.23.2006 no virus found
McAfee 4768 05.23.2006 no virus found
Microsoft 1.1440 05.22.2006 no virus found
NOD32v2 1.1553 05.22.2006 no virus found
Norman 5.90.17 05.23.2006 no virus found
Panda 9.0.0.4 05.23.2006 no virus found
Sophos 4.05.0 05.23.2006 no virus found
Symantec 8.0 05.23.2006 no virus found
TheHacker 5.9.8.146 05.22.2006 no virus found
UNA 1.83 05.23.2006 no virus found
VBA32 3.11.0 05.23.2006 no virus found


Aditional Information
File size: 8343429 bytes
MD5: 5935b1ece5924cbf0e8af0fce8e583e2
SHA1: 314d14cf3d0b93e7b4568fccce7527d8bc7807ed

 

[Gordon Darling]

Bible Seeker, which was mentioned in ACF some time ago, is infected with a
virus.

http://www.all4you.dk/FreewareWorld/links.php?id=12573

The file from Download.com (bblskr.exe) shows as clean with BitDefender,
Clamscan, F-Prot, Anti-Vir and AVG7.

Regards
Gordon

 

[Gordon Darling]

Frank Bohan, 5/23/2006, 12:12:35 PM,

[quoted text muted]

What virus? Have you submitted it to Virus Total to make sure?
http://www.virustotal.com/en/indexf.html

Another site for a second opinion is
http://virusscan.jotti.org/

Regards
Gordon

 

[Frank Bohan]

Frank Bohan, 5/23/2006, 12:12:35 PM,



What virus? Have you submitted it to Virus Total to make sure?
http://www.virustotal.com/en/indexf.html

Can't remember the name of the virus, but it was detected by E-trust, which
deleted the file so I could not check it. Better safe than sorry!

===

Frank Bohan
¶ Klein bottle for rent - inquire within.

 

[PDFrank]

Bible Seeker, which was mentioned in ACF some time ago, is infected with a
virus.

http://www.all4you.dk/FreewareWorld/links.php?id=12573

That's just the devil trying to deceive you, young man.

 

[badgolferman]

Can't remember the name of the virus, but it was detected by E-trust, which deleted the file so I could not check it. Better safe than sorry!

===

Frank Bohan
¶ Klein bottle for rent - inquire within.

Three things, Frank.

Firstly, I called you Bob by mistake on the previous post. Sorry.

Secondly, the E-Trust version at Virus Total scanned it as clean. Unfortunately the false alarm you posted is similar to Internet hoaxes that get passed around and propagated in the spirit of "safe rather than sorry" when in reality they just cause lots of confusion. No bad on your part, that's one reason I dropped E-Trust; because they had too many false positives.

Thirdly, please fix your signature separator so newsreaders can strip it when replying. Thank you.

 

[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BBQ=AB?=]

Thirdly, please fix your signature separator so newsreaders can strip it when replying. Thank you.

It wouldn't be a bad thing if you also fixed your separator, along with
your line lengths.

 

[badgolferman]

It wouldn't be a bad thing if you also fixed your separator, along with
your line lengths.

There is nothing wrong with my separator if you're not socialist.

My posting settings are set to MIME-Quoted Printable to prevent line break of long URLs. The point of 'format = flowed' and 'quoted printable' is so that modern clients can reassemble these lines so that they are as long as the author originally intended. Using '72' as the break point is just a convenience in case anyone is using an old, teletype-era news client (is anyone??). But every newsreader in the world these days will correctly reassemble the lines.

 

[Frank Bohan]

In response to various posts, I must concede that E-Trust may have produced
a false positive. If so, this is the first one I have received in many years
of using CA products. On checking, I find that I did not download the
program from the site mentioned in my first post -- this was the site
mentioned in the acf archives. I downloaded from
http://www.brothersoft.com/, which is given a "yellow card" by Site Advisor.
I have therefore amended the heading of this post to include ????????.

===

Frank Bohan
¶ The chicken crossed the road to watch the builders laying bricks.

 

[Vrodok the Piglet lover]

Once Upon A Time (on 24 May 2006 10:39:14 GMT), in alt.comp.freeware,

There is nothing wrong with my separator if you're not socialist.

My posting settings are set to MIME-Quoted Printable to prevent line break of long
URLs. The point of 'format = flowed' and 'quoted printable' is so that modern clients
can reassemble these lines so that they are as long as the author originally intended.
Using '72' as the break point is just a convenience in case anyone is using an old,
teletype-era news client (is anyone??). But every newsreader in the world these days
will correctly reassemble the lines.

"New" and/or "improved" is not always (the) best.

 

[Subterranean Cinema]

Bible Seeker, which was mentioned in ACF some time ago, is infected with a
virus.

http://www.all4you.dk/FreewareWorld/links.php?id=12573

Maybe it's the Nile virus, no, wait, the West Bank virii, no, wait, let's
make up a new name.

Grouper Virus.

 

[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BBQ=AB?=]

There is nothing wrong with my separator if you're not socialist.

A sig delimiter should be "-- ". Since you are using quoted printable,
the trailing space must be encoded as =20, but there's no =20 in yours.
My guess is that it's a bug in Xananews.

 

[badgolferman]

»Q«, 5/24/2006, 11:13:17 AM,

A sig delimiter should be "-- ". Since you are using quoted
printable, the trailing space must be encoded as =20, but there's no
=20 in yours. My guess is that it's a bug in Xananews.

How about now? I have changed my posting settings to NNTP.

 

[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BBQ=AB?=]

My posting settings are set to MIME-Quoted Printable to prevent
line break of long URLs. The point of 'format = flowed' and
'quoted printable' is so that modern clients can reassemble these
lines so that they are as long as the author originally intended.

Sorry to reply twice to the same post. I understand the desire to
prevent breaking of long URLs, but I've never thought q-p was a good
solution. My client does reassemble your lines so that they are as
long as you intended; in that last post, you intended a 484-character
line, less than half of which fits on my screen, which is only 1600
pixels wide. I can change my settings to view your posts, breaking
your long lines at the edge of the viewing window, but of course that
can re-break the long URLs, which is what you're trying to avoid in the
first place.

It'd be nice if Xananews had a way to hard-wrap most lines but leave
some lines unwrapped, such as long URLs. Some clients can do this by
putting the long URL in <delimiters>.

 

[Gabriele Neukam]

On that special day, badgolferman, ([email protected])
said...

How about now? I have changed my posting settings to NNTP.

It works.


Gabriele Neukam

(e-mail address removed)

 

[FTR]

Sorry, how do you fix the separator? And what for ?

- Frank

 

[BoB]

In response to various posts, I must concede that E-Trust may have produced
a false positive. If so, this is the first one I have received in many years
of using CA products. On checking, I find that I did not download the
program from the site mentioned in my first post -- this was the site
mentioned in the acf archives. I downloaded from
http://www.brothersoft.com/, which is given a "yellow card" by Site Advisor.
I have therefore amended the heading of this post to include ????????.

===

Frank Bohan
? The chicken crossed the road to watch the builders laying bricks.

Did you send an info to Site Advisor? They may want to check it again
and change it to a RED card "if" it was not a FP on EZ's part.

My subscription had two months to go when I uninstalled EZ. I registered
after it went non-freeware but recently lost patience with EZ. It would
not upgrade unless I uninstalled eScan's MWav. I now use Mwav, Bit
Defender, NOD32 and F-Prot for DOS. They all get along since I don't run
AV's in real-time.

BoB

 

[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BBQ=AB?=]

How about now? I have changed my posting settings to NNTP.

It's fine now. Thanks.