I want to report the bug in "Windows 2000", this is a bug, I found it, I want from Microsoft some re

L

Lucky

This problem is reported on 47 world major forums and its being
recognize by 1288 people repotted it back to me-
(I received insuperable amount of emails ,for just 2 days and my mail
account and my internet connection is to slow to handle this huge
amount of Windows 2000 users with this problem, I stopped that email
and I stopped on 1288 received conformations from 1288 users I cant
handle more emails, sorry but with this rate it easy can be 10000 or
10000 mails),
-that they all got the same problem and When I talked with some
Microsoft Technician, I phone them to inform Microsoft I found the Bug
in Windows 2000, he told me "go to security forums ,give them your
logs and if you are clear we can publish this BUG in knowledge base",
I did that, everything is clear that this is a Bug in Windows 2000.
Can I find someone here from Microsoft who is able to report this BUG
to Microsoft knowledge base,

here is brief explanation or some part of discussions from forums:
Operating system is Windows 2000 pro ,server,adv. server with Service
pack 4:
-----------------------------------------------

Strange things happen, because when I right click on taskbar section
or on quick Launch section, Cpu time goes up to 10-30% for
explorer.exe and if I do something like watching movie, I will get (if
I do right click normally) pause for a second , or some kind of memory
or CPU hog.

If I constantly repeat this right click, on taskbar, I can watch cpu
times goes like this, 1-2 clicks 20-30%, 3-4-5 clicks 60-70%, 6-7-8
clicks gives me 90-99% and if I just continue to click on right mouse
its constantly on 99% and its all on explorer.exe.

Something utilize explorer.exe on right click but what ,where can I
find section in registry which is responsible for right mouse clicks
and right mouse button menu ore something for desktop ,Active X or God
ask what. I don't know what to blame.

Windows 2000 pro Sp4 ,Asus Motherboard p4p800, P4 2.4c, HT disabled,
1gb ddr, Gainward fx56000 with starstorm detonators 56.67 ex, Audigy 2
NX with latest drivers , Intel chip set with latest driver.
I did sfc check and I replaced all files suspicious by Windows
protection , I reinstalled Service Pack 4 , I did reinstall NVIDIA
detonators, I reinstalled Intel chipset driver , I reinstalled Direct
X 9, I tried with IE6 repair process ,I tried with Office 2003
reinstall or repair , I tried with registry cleaners......

These pictures represents visual explanation of this Bug:

http://loopdemack.spymac.net/Pictures/picture10.jpg
http://loopdemack.spymac.net/Pictures/picture11.jpg
http://loopdemack.spymac.net/Pictures/picture12.jpg
http://loopdemack.spymac.net/Pictures/picture13.jpg



Please, Microsoft look at this pictures.


Constantly right clicking on the taskbar will raise explorer.exe CPU
usage to 99% and hold it there for as long as you keep clicking - in
fact, if you activate "Show kernel times" in the View menu, you will
notice the vast majority of those 99% is spent at kernel level -
according to taskman at least (once you activate that switch, times in
the Performance tab will be shown as green for user level, or red for
kernel level).

Just wtf ring 0 code is doing showing a context sensitive menu on a
supposed microkernel OS is beyond me... Well, not really, obviously if
something's being done to hardware (i.e. showing the menu on screen),
it'll have to go through kernel sooner or later (I just felt like
criticising them a bit ). Anyway, this information (about the time
being mostly kernel) may be important to report to MS, as it will
probably help to pinpoint the problem - if CPU usage is indeed at ring
0 then it narrows it down a bit for them where to look at, it may be
in the hardware access routines for example, or more likely something
at userland is doing some improper calls of kernel-related APIs
(LocalAlloc/LocalFree in cycle, for a simple unrelated example).

Two notes: memory usage was not significantly altered throughout the
test - explorer.exe did not consume any more memory while I was right
clicking on the taskbar; and the explorer.exe CPU usage kept stable at
99% even after I had stopped right clicking, while the menu was still
open. That is, repeatedly right clicking the taskbar raised CPU usage
to 99%, and after it had reached that level, even without any more
clicks, just by leaving the context menu open (i.e. not clicking
anywhere else), CPU usage was still 99%. It only dropped back to 0%
after I closed the menu.

As a point of comparison, I tried right clicking somewhere else: I
went to the Start Menu -> Run dialog box, and right clicked repeatedly
on the text field (thus showing the Edit, Cut, Paste, blabla menu).
CPU usage hardly ever got above 0%, the highest was 2%. Definetly
something wrong here, I almost feel like taking out the debugger on
this one...
 
G

Guest

Wait C man, explain to us, what you are talking, "Excuse me for not being able to make any sense out of the original post or yours" , what my original post , I don't know what are talking about.
Tell me, who is your major perpetrator, are you mad on Microsoft or on this guy Lucky.
If you are mad on Microsoft, what is your point to express your self in here with that odious vocabulary and if you are mad on this guy Lucky, tell us why, do you know him , is he telling a lie.
I have same bug as he?????
I don't know what's wrong, could you explain, if you are kind enough.

Best regards Johan
 
L

Lucky

C, why do you think I need help, and who is that person you are
applying me for. You think I am crazy, why my friend, tell me I am
Microsoft MCSE and I am Beta Tester, I wanted to help. There is bunch
of users with this problem, I even make pictures for users without
English knowledge, or if some one didn't understand me, he can look on
pictures, and one picture has 100x times more power than 100 words.
Its what I think and its my statement.

I explain in forepart of my text, that I had huge amount of mails
received from users using windows 2000, with same bug, C I must remind
you, we are talking about this bug for about 10 days on biggest
computer forums in the World, sorry we didn't open that discussion on
some Germans forums but I don't speak German, because I see this is
your native language, I simple paste some of discussions to this
newsgroup, because I heard, Microsoft will acknowledge this bug if its
recognized on Microsoft forums or news groups supported by Microsoft.

See you, C
 
C

C

Lucky said:
C, why do you think I need help, and who is that person you are
applying me for. You think I am crazy, why my friend, tell me I am
Microsoft MCSE and I am Beta Tester, I wanted to help. There is bunch
of users with this problem, I even make pictures for users without
English knowledge, or if some one didn't understand me, he can look on
pictures, and one picture has 100x times more power than 100 words.
Its what I think and its my statement.

I explain in forepart of my text, that I had huge amount of mails
received from users using windows 2000, with same bug, C I must remind
you, we are talking about this bug for about 10 days on biggest
computer forums in the World, sorry we didn't open that discussion on
some Germans forums but I don't speak German, because I see this is
your native language, I simple paste some of discussions to this
newsgroup, because I heard, Microsoft will acknowledge this bug if its
recognized on Microsoft forums or news groups supported by Microsoft.

See you, C
Sorry. Can't understand a word you have written, again!
C
 
C

C

Johan said:
Wait C man, explain to us, what you are talking, "Excuse me for not being
able to make any sense out of the original post or yours" , what my original
post , I don't know what are talking about.
Tell me, who is your major perpetrator, are you mad on Microsoft or on this guy Lucky.
If you are mad on Microsoft, what is your point to express your self in
here with that odious vocabulary and if you are mad on this guy Lucky, tell
us why, do you know him , is he telling a lie.
I have same bug as he?????
I don't know what's wrong, could you explain, if you are kind enough.

Best regards Johan
Sorry. Can't understand a word you have written, again!
C
 
P

ptwilliams

Guys, I think you can safely ignore C. Your English isn't perfect, but
then, very few people have perfect English. Those of us who do, still make
mistakes from time to time. I'm able to understand pretty much what you are
saying, and I think that you should perhaps try and contact Microsoft again.
If you have dealt with a member of Microsoft who has treated you poorly, or
not to your liking ask to speak to that person's senior team member, or log
a complaint through the regular customer support channels.

Otherwise, please try and write down your problem in an e-mail and send it
to Microsoft Product Support Services. If you are a Beta tester, then you
will know of more routes to MS personnel than most of us. You could even
try speaking to a Beta person -they will know who to speak to regarding
problems in Microsoft products.




--

Paul Williams
_________________________________________
http://www.msresource.net - Under construction, but coming soon...


Join us in our new forums!
http://forums.msresource.net
_________________________________________


Johan said:
Wait C man, explain to us, what you are talking, "Excuse me for not being
able to make any sense out of the original post or yours" , what my original
post , I don't know what are talking about.
Tell me, who is your major perpetrator, are you mad on Microsoft or on this guy Lucky.
If you are mad on Microsoft, what is your point to express your self in
here with that odious vocabulary and if you are mad on this guy Lucky, tell
us why, do you know him , is he telling a lie.
 
C

C

ptwilliams said:
Guys, I think you can safely ignore C. Your English isn't perfect, but
then, very few people have perfect English. Those of us who do, still make
mistakes from time to time. I'm able to understand pretty much what you are
saying, and I think that you should perhaps try and contact Microsoft again.
If you have dealt with a member of Microsoft who has treated you poorly, or
not to your liking ask to speak to that person's senior team member, or log
a complaint through the regular customer support channels.

Otherwise, please try and write down your problem in an e-mail and send it
to Microsoft Product Support Services. If you are a Beta tester, then you
will know of more routes to MS personnel than most of us. You could even
try speaking to a Beta person -they will know who to speak to regarding
problems in Microsoft products.
Paul Williams
_________________________________________

Excellent, thankyou. A sensible suggestion, without malice and easily
understood! :)
C
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top