http://anti-virus-software-review.toptenreviews.com/

[Guest]

Article on review of top 10 anti virus programs:
http://anti-virus-software-review.toptenreviews.com/

 

[Art]

Article on review of top 10 anti virus programs:
http://anti-virus-software-review.toptenreviews.com/

A few questions.

1. Why isn't detection rate included in the criteria?
2. How was the "top ten" determined?
3. Why are several top notch products not included?
4. Who paid for the tests?

Art

http://home.epix.net/~artnpeg

 

[Tom J]

A few questions.

1. Why isn't detection rate included in the criteria?

They paid to leave it out?

2. How was the "top ten" determined?

In the order that paid the most for the listing?

3. Why are several top notch products not included?

They didn't pay for a listing?

4. Who paid for the tests?

See 2 above?

May not be all true, but my guess is, it's close!!

Tom J

 

[Guest]

I think they all had detection rates for viruses in the wild of 100% or so.

 

[Art]

I think they all had detection rates for viruses in the wild of 100% or so.

Most all av do. Means nothing.

Art

http://home.epix.net/~artnpeg

 

[nobody]

Article on review of top 10 anti virus programs:
http://anti-virus-software-review.toptenreviews.com/

Whby should I trust a website that pushes BitDefender and Spyware
Eliminator at me with a popup ad?? Somebody is accepting money for the
opinons/ratings .

 

[Shadowman]

Whby should I trust a website that pushes BitDefender and Spyware
Eliminator at me with a popup ad?? Somebody is accepting money for the
opinons/ratings .

Yeah, I noticed that too. Sounds fishy...

 

[David H. Lipman]

From: <[email protected]>

| Article on review of top 10 anti virus programs:
| http://anti-virus-software-review.toptenreviews.com/
|

Totally biased ratings without backing up how they were assessed.