John Wilson said:
Hi Steve yes I was deliberatley going for the worst case of bloatsville with
the 9 mb example. Howevr even the second version ("done properly") shrank 10
times when I used the paste special on it, this I dont understand.
OK, I think I can explain that as well:
When you bring in an image, PowerPoint stores the full original image
internally. Even if you shrink the image down to say 1" square, it's still
expanding the PPT file size by a meg.
If you copy the image to the clipobard, it goes up there in quite a few
different formats; when you choose Paste Special, you get to pick which format
you want pasted.
The default would be as an office drawing object ... in other words, you'd
paste back a duplicate of whatever you copied.
But PPT also puts the *displayed* image on the clipboard in several formats.
In other words, if the slide's taking up a bit less than full 1024x768 screen
size ... let's say 1000 pixels to make it easier on my head ... and your image
is taking up 1/10 of the slide area, you get a 100 pixel image on the clipboard
as well as the full image.
When you paste as JPG, PNG or one of the other specific image formats, you get
this "display" image, not the original. And if the original was a largish PNG
and you replace it with a 100-pixel JPG, deleting the original in the process
... well. You can see where the size reduction kicks in. ;-)
To make it more apparent, pop in a screen capture ... Alt+PrtScreen's fine.
Shrink it very small on the slide, copy and paste back as JPG, then bump it
back up to the orginal size.
See what I mean?