Help me diagnose a faulty PC

[Mahatma Gazwad]

Michael Hawes, <[email protected]>, the frowning, bucktooth
diseased prostitute, and official recorder of events of historical
unimportance, decried:

Why the hell do you think jedmister1 is replying to Mahatma
Gazwad? It's a NEWSGROUP!! You reply to the group! Or are you just
stirring? Mike.

You thick ****.

--
For my own part, I have never had a thought which I could not set down
in words with even more distinctness than that with which I conceived
it. There is, however, a class of fancies of exquisite delicacy which
are not thoughts, and to which as yet I have found it absolutely
impossible to adapt to language. These fancies arise in the soul, alas
how rarely. Only at epochs of most intense tranquillity, when the
bodily and mental health are in perfection. And at those weird points
of time, where the confines of the waking world blend with the world of
dreams. And so I captured this fancy, where all that we see, or seem,
is but a dream within a dream.

 

[Francois]

CPU's generally do not fail,
and if they do they fail entirely; not intermitently.

I disagree. I had intermittent problems with a K6-III, years ago, which were
caused by a faulty cache.

Fred

 

[Guest]

Ummm sorry brain dead, I thought I was replying to the group......
lets see "reply group" Hmmmm, yes, yes, I think, no, I'm certain, unless a
pirate has misconstrued my buttons that is where I replied... so, drop the
foul language, take a pill and accept my appologies if I seem to have
offended you. But, sounded like a basic check and no one had addressed it
back thru the thread... believe me, I read each and every one of your
replies.... the only thing ya'll didn't tell her to do was sell her house,
car, husband, kids and mother and move to a forign country and try it from a
different continent.

My God dont people get tempormental!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Mahatma Gazwad]

Ummm sorry brain dead,

That's no excuse. Try to guide your fists more accurately when smashing the
keyboard.

I thought

Are you certain?

I was replying to the group......

You was replying to the newsgroup on Usenet, it's a simple notion so it's
not unsurprising that you were confused.
The term "Reply Group" is there to differentiatebetween replying to Usenet
and replying to someone via e-mail.
It's up to you to reply to the correct person within the group. That's
something you failed to do.
Was it becasue you are dim and easily duped into beleiving the magykal
pyxsees of teh hinternet would intercept your drivel and sort it out to
coincide with what fleetingly flashed across your mind?

lets see "reply group" Hmmmm, yes, yes, I think, no, I'm certain,
unless a pirate has misconstrued my buttons that is where I
replied...

Well, there you have it, more evidence of your state of confusion.
I bet you believe WCs get married.

so, drop the foul language, take a pill and accept my
appologies if I seem to have offended you.

Shove the pill up your arse, you might be pleasently surprised.

But, sounded like a basic
check and no one had addressed it back thru the thread... believe me,
I read each and every one of your replies

Please point out where I claimed to offer any advice.

.... the only thing ya'll
didn't tell her to do was sell her house, car, husband, kids and
mother and move to a forign country and try it from a different
continent.

No, that train of thought is entirely your own. You're more confused than
you would have us beleive.

My God dont people get tempormental!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Are you "on" ?

--
For my own part, I have never had a thought which I could not set down
in words with even more distinctness than that with which I conceived
it. There is, however, a class of fancies of exquisite delicacy which
are not thoughts, and to which as yet I have found it absolutely
impossible to adapt to language. These fancies arise in the soul, alas
how rarely. Only at epochs of most intense tranquillity, when the
bodily and mental health are in perfection. And at those weird points
of time, where the confines of the waking world blend with the world of
dreams. And so I captured this fancy, where all that we see, or seem,
is but a dream within a dream.