C
chesjak
Hi
I have been told that "most people" set up their system with two H/D's so
that say in my case with a 160Gb and a 500Gb drive I install the operating
system on the 160Gb H/H and then all my programmes and data etc on the 500Gb.
This would aparently overcome the problem I had recently wher I tried to do
a Windows restore in XP and for some unknown reason it corupted the whole H/D
and I had to re install everything.
Is this so and would it be better than setting up the H/D's in RAID 1
configuration.
How would this work, would I make the 160gb or the 500Gb H/d the C: drive.
Would this slow the system down at all. How convenient is it rather than
having everytghing on one H/D.
Regards
I have been told that "most people" set up their system with two H/D's so
that say in my case with a 160Gb and a 500Gb drive I install the operating
system on the 160Gb H/H and then all my programmes and data etc on the 500Gb.
This would aparently overcome the problem I had recently wher I tried to do
a Windows restore in XP and for some unknown reason it corupted the whole H/D
and I had to re install everything.
Is this so and would it be better than setting up the H/D's in RAID 1
configuration.
How would this work, would I make the 160gb or the 500Gb H/d the C: drive.
Would this slow the system down at all. How convenient is it rather than
having everytghing on one H/D.
Regards