Y Yousuf Khan Jun 25, 2004 #1 http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1617083,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594
Y Yousuf Khan Jun 25, 2004 #2 http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1617083,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594 Looks like this bug is now resulting in a full-blown recall of Intel 915 motherboards: http://www.digitimes.com/NewsShow/Article.asp?datePublish=2004/06/25&pages=PR&seq=202 Yousuf Khan
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1617083,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594 Looks like this bug is now resulting in a full-blown recall of Intel 915 motherboards: http://www.digitimes.com/NewsShow/Article.asp?datePublish=2004/06/25&pages=PR&seq=202 Yousuf Khan
J Judd Jun 25, 2004 #3 Alderwood is better anyway ;-) Yousuf Khan said: http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1617083,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594 Looks like this bug is now resulting in a full-blown recall of Intel 915 motherboards: http://www.digitimes.com/NewsShow/Article.asp?datePublish=2004/06/25&pages=PR&seq=202 Yousuf Khan Click to expand...
Alderwood is better anyway ;-) Yousuf Khan said: http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1617083,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594 Looks like this bug is now resulting in a full-blown recall of Intel 915 motherboards: http://www.digitimes.com/NewsShow/Article.asp?datePublish=2004/06/25&pages=PR&seq=202 Yousuf Khan Click to expand...
Y Yousuf Khan Jun 25, 2004 #4 Judd said: Alderwood is better anyway ;-) Click to expand... I think the 925 is also part of the recall. Yousuf Khan
Judd said: Alderwood is better anyway ;-) Click to expand... I think the 925 is also part of the recall. Yousuf Khan
C Carlo Razzeto Jun 27, 2004 #5 Yousuf Khan said: http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1617083,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594 Click to expand... To be totally fair it seems this is more of a manufacturing defect then a "bug" ( assuming you define bug as a design flaw that got past QA ). Carlo
Yousuf Khan said: http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1617083,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594 Click to expand... To be totally fair it seems this is more of a manufacturing defect then a "bug" ( assuming you define bug as a design flaw that got past QA ). Carlo
T Tony Hill Jun 29, 2004 #6 I think the 925 is also part of the recall. Click to expand... Yup, it looks like it's actually the ICH6 part, ie the I/O chip or "Southbridge" using the old terminology, not the memory controller chip. As another poster mentioned it was a manufacturing defect rather than a design bug.
I think the 925 is also part of the recall. Click to expand... Yup, it looks like it's actually the ICH6 part, ie the I/O chip or "Southbridge" using the old terminology, not the memory controller chip. As another poster mentioned it was a manufacturing defect rather than a design bug.
