Mike, As the old song goes, "different strokes for different folks"
My needs for backup are pretty simple. I have only 35 ghz of stuff on my
"C" drive which is a 320ghz WD SATA3 unit. The removable drive in the
Vantec external enclosure is identical and I update it weekly, or more often
if I have made any significant changes to "C". As I said, this fulfills my
needs nicely.
I also have a third 320ghz HD drive in the second HD bay of my computer.
When I decided to try IE8, I cloned my then existing "C" drive -- which had
a fast, reliable, smooth running IE7 browser -- to it in order to have a
"safe" backup, as I had read many horror stories of all the problems people
were having with IE8. As it turned out IE8 has worked beautifully for me so
it is my prime and I now have it cloned to my Vantec external enclosure
drive.
What I really like about Casper 5.0 is the ability to toss things around
quickly among the 3 drives without fear of losing anything. I had
previously purchased ATI 2009 from Amazon and returned it because I found it
not very user friendly - certainly not when compared with Casper, IMHO. As
always,YMMV.
As I said, different strokes.............
==========================================================
bobster said:
I think what does make sense to many users is to have a reliable means of
ensuring that their valuable files AND their apps (many of which the source
is long gone) are preserved. I can't think of a better way of doing this
than having a 100% reliable means of cloning one's "C" drive and Casper 5.0
does that quickly, reliably and simply.
Perhaps that is not what Rachel is looking for but it sure works for me and
gives me a great deal of security knowing that I will always have a
complete
backup of everything including the operating system.
I have Acronis True Image 2009 (have used ATI since ver. 8) and I also
have Casper 5.0. I use both daily... but for different reasons.
I use ATI to make backups of my entire "C" drive in case something
gets so screwed up that the only way to fix it is to reinstall, or
restore from backup - the latter being the best scenario. I have
several full backups going back 45 days. My most recent full backup
was made 10 days ago and I've made incremental backups every day since
then.
Why do I use Casper? I use it ONLY to clone my "C" drive to another
internal drive that I can instantly use if my "C" drive totally dies.
I like Casper's ability to update the clone faster than the time it
takes to do a full clone with ATI. If I didn't have that extra
internal drive to use for that purpose, I would have no need of
Casper.
I believe Acronis True Image is the best backup choice for 99% if
computer users.