M
Mutlley
David said:
And what's wrong with American english?? At least it doesn't reverse
letters around and add needless letters to a around just to be poncy
And what's wrong with American english?? At least it doesn't reverse
letters around and add needless letters to a around just to be poncy
S
Steven
Oops, you answered your own question.
D
David
UKEn is included rather than being a separate download. Some other en
versions are also included.
D
David
Removes what? Redsherrif or Java? It may detect Java but it certainly
does not remove it or flag it as being in any way remotely suspicious.
I have had no experience with Redsherrif so I can't comment.
D
David
No. I had dumped the installer.
D
David
What's wrong with using
1) indexes as the plural of index?
2) disrespect as a verb?
3) hung as the past tense of to hang (execution)?
4) the phrase "Like I said, ..."?
5) hisself as a word?
6) irregardless as a word?
Some schools use to actually teach English grammar in the US, but alas
a Euro-centric curriculum fell out of favor in public schools in the
70's. Sigh.
Ron
Shouldn't that just read that "curriculum fell ..."
?
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BBQ=AB?=
Well, it's not required but OOo without Java is crippled. The database
requires it, and the wizards.
<http://download.openoffice.org/2.0.2/java.html>
This has created quite a bit of controversy among people interested in
free (as in Stallman) software, since there's no free software JRE, but
many free software distros had come to rely on OOo.
R
Richard Huber
FTR said:
Hi Frank,
pls tell an non-english-native speaker what's the difference between
american-english, british-english, australian-english and ...-english.
Well, I know that there are differences in pronunciation and maybe they
use different words.
But why there are different softwareapplications necessary?
Maybe another spell-checker or so ...
???
Regards
Richard from Bavaria (Newswanstone)
F
FTR
Harvey said:
Thank you, Harvey. This is what I meant. I only need the French
(Luxembourg) edition
-)Frank
F
FTR
You shouldn't translate the name of the famous Bavarian castle. NoRichard said:
American tourist or former soldier will realise you mean Neu-Schwanstein
castle. And BTW, no American would translate Los Angeles in Die Engel,
for the sake of the foreigners.
Maybe it's better to leave the answer to the Brits, NZ, ZA or others. As
a German living in France and often using "Continental English" as my
working language I'd say there are differences in spelling (organisation
vs. organization, programme instead of program, night instead of nite,
for instance).
For an OpenOffice user the only - and sometimes disturbing - difficulty
is the choice of the language for speller and thesaurus. If I remember
well there as no EnglishUK thesaurus included in the last version so
when you wrote in in British English and tried to improve your choice of
words I think I had to copy the American Thesaurus as a British one. or
something like that. Anyway, for my English vocabulary I often use the
Sage and the Mobysaurus thesaures (?) which were recommended here in the
list, and they'are excellent.
- Frank
D
David
It's mainly spelling although some words are used with different
meanings.
C
Craig
Richard said:
Hi Richard;
I'm not Frank, but I am a native American-English speaker. (Although,
since I am from California, many Americans might suggest I speak
"Valley," but I digress...) I can sketch for you the differences
between American- and British-English. And, I'll wager that the
explanation might be applied generally to the "other -Englishes"
There are incidental changes. We say "truck" where Brits say "lorry,"
or "trunk" instead of "boot." This, imo, comes from the fact that
American-English forked from British-English. We were both experiencing
the development of the automobile but, separated by time & space. Then,
there's the (curiously) purposeful changes.
Far and away, the most evident example of purposeful change is embodied
by Noah Webster. In the early 1800's, he published the first American
dictionary of the English language. He followed up w/another edition
and, it was wildly popular here. In fact, if you ask an American what
they think of when you say "Webster," chances are they'll mention
"dictionary." And so?
Webster, for whatever reason, /intentionally/ changed the British
spellings of many words. I have read reasons such as to be
patriotic(*), or, to make the spelling of words more closely match their
pronunciation (phonetics).
Time for me to get back to work.
-Craig
(*)Patriotic: Webster's dictionaries came out soon after the British
invaded and burned the U.S. capitol to the ground. You might remember a
more modern example of American patriotic linguistics: the US Congress
became upset at the French government not too long ago. They then
passed a rule, changing the name of a potato dish served in the
Congressional cafeteria from "French Fries" to "Freedom Fries."
D
Daniel Mandic
Steven said:
You should also count with your toenails
orig. Quote >Anything other than the US Corruption of English.
reply: >> > At least it doesn't reverse
Best Regards,
Daniel Mandic
G
Gabriele Neukam
On that special day, FTR, ([email protected]) said...
FYI: The international versions are now available, too. I am currently
downloading the german one.
Gabriele Neukam
(e-mail address removed)
FYI: The international versions are now available, too. I am currently
downloading the german one.
Gabriele Neukam
(e-mail address removed)
A
Andy Mabbett
Olaf Greck said:
A few niggles:
* It's annoying having to download 89Mb (in my case); have these
people not heard of "patches"?
* A page like:
http://www.mirror.ac.uk/mirror/sunsite.dk/openoffice/stable/2.0
..2/
is hardly going to encourage the average non-techie to witch
from MS Office.
* Unless things have changed from the previous version, I can't
tell OOo to use the same "custom.dic" and other dictionary files
as I use with Word, my e-mail client, as other applications.
A
Andy Mabbett
Richard Huber said:
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_and_British_English_differences
Hence the phrase "two nations, divided by a common language"!
?
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BBQ=AB?=
A
Andy Mabbett
In message <[email protected]>,
Q
[Non-ascii charactes removed]
If you care to read the post which you followed-up, you will see that I
wasn't sending anybody anywhere, I was discussing the failings of a
*specific* web page.
Q
[Non-ascii charactes removed]
If you care to read the post which you followed-up, you will see that I
wasn't sending anybody anywhere, I was discussing the failings of a
*specific* web page.
M
Morten Skarstad
Andy Mabbett skrev:
It's a web mirror of an FTP site. What do you expect such a site to look
like?
You _know_ what FTP is, right?
It's a web mirror of an FTP site. What do you expect such a site to look
like?
You _know_ what FTP is, right?
D
David
Since he doesn't know what a valid .sig looks like probably not.