G
Graham Stevenson
Hi,
I'm using FP2003 to create a WSS-based site. When I connect to a web service
which returns lots of data (some 4000+ rows in a dataset), FP2003 grinds
almost to a halt.For example in split view mode, click in the dataview grid
and it goes into 17/18 seconds of 100% cpu activity. Click on a line of code
and it does the same. Makes using it almost impossible.
Running on a 1G PIII with 512M RAM and XP Pro. Server running WSS is
completely separate box over a 100MHz LAN. NB No network activity when FP
slows down.
Other pages are fine - even if this slow page is open (but not active). Its
got to be down to FP caching this data in the page !!!.
FP currently claims to be using 173 MBytes, but the whole system is at
549M - I suspect FP is NOT telling the truth, as it has claimed 240M+
earlier and the overall usage has NOT come down again.
Every click on FP takes 15+secs of 100%cpu time, even the close button. When
it eventually closed (from above) it returned me to 269M used (ie returning
some 280 M !!!!).
Hope someone can help me here as this is making the otherwise excellent
product unusable.
Thanks
Graham
I'm using FP2003 to create a WSS-based site. When I connect to a web service
which returns lots of data (some 4000+ rows in a dataset), FP2003 grinds
almost to a halt.For example in split view mode, click in the dataview grid
and it goes into 17/18 seconds of 100% cpu activity. Click on a line of code
and it does the same. Makes using it almost impossible.
Running on a 1G PIII with 512M RAM and XP Pro. Server running WSS is
completely separate box over a 100MHz LAN. NB No network activity when FP
slows down.
Other pages are fine - even if this slow page is open (but not active). Its
got to be down to FP caching this data in the page !!!.
FP currently claims to be using 173 MBytes, but the whole system is at
549M - I suspect FP is NOT telling the truth, as it has claimed 240M+
earlier and the overall usage has NOT come down again.
Every click on FP takes 15+secs of 100%cpu time, even the close button. When
it eventually closed (from above) it returned me to 269M used (ie returning
some 280 M !!!!).
Hope someone can help me here as this is making the otherwise excellent
product unusable.
Thanks
Graham