Dustin Harper said:
I know. Hardware released a year after XP was released did run the
OS as fast as a quad core does with Vista a year after it was
released. Isn't that the point?! What use is a quad core if you
don't have the software to take advantage of it. Why have the
latest and greatest if it doesn't offer any extra?!
I haven't figured that one out yet, I recall my first PC (not my first
home computer by many years!) was a 386DX-25. Now I have an Athlon X2
5200+ and I'm STILL typing this at 30 WPM! Where's the improvement?
No, I'm not trying to be funny, ever since my IBM 1401 days computers
have been I/O bound and still are. You can't enter data faster than
you can type, you can't print faster than your printer, you can't
transmit faster than your internet connection so... why spend a ton on
things that won't speed things up for you?