D
David
Not entirely correct. The original must have been sharp enough toIrrelevant. The camera might have been fantastic but that's nothing to do
with blowing it up and still looking sharp in this instance. He's not
blowing up the original photo, he's blowing up a scanned copy of the
original. Unless the photo was scanned at some extremely high rez and posted
it in some lossless format, the original observation doesn't make sense.
display sufficient detail before the original scan.
I agree with your comments about JPEG but it could have been in PNGIf the photo was a jpg, it would show significant artifacting blown up to
10x -- I doubt anything would even be recognizable. And I doubt it was a
lossless format such as BMP or TIFF as the online file size would have been
ginormous to hold that much information, assuming a scanner anywhere could
have scanned that much info in.
format which is a compressed, lossless format that resembles GIF but
allows more colours. Since the picture is B/W the number of colours is
really immaterial except for the amount of shading which can be
applied. It is highly probable that as a B/W image it was in GIF
format. This would allow for expansion up to the original size with
little need for interpolation.
I have to agree with this. It's unfortunate that PSP is off-topic inEither:
1. The original poster might have been exxagerating somewhat. (My guess. . .
)
2. PSP has some amazing internal algorithm for interpolating zoomed in
images.
this group.