O
omega
ms said:Every so often, I run a file, get the screen: "missing MSCOREE" (IIRC)
What does that signify, other than a missing file?
Signifies the app is dependent on the MSFT .NET framework ...
ms said:Every so often, I run a file, get the screen: "missing MSCOREE" (IIRC)
What does that signify, other than a missing file?
In some ways, Oregon is the land time forgot. If I lived in Portland, that would besomeone said:Hi Mike. Surely there must be a local (to you) computer users club\group.
The guys are generally very helpful and friendly.
I`m sure someone would d\load and burn for you.
ms said:Every so often, I run a file, get the screen: "missing MSCOREE" (IIRC)
W2k is a predecessor to XP, which is super stable & W2k is lot moreWas your experience with W2K that it is:
a. more stable than W98SE
b. more resistant to software caused crashes than W98SE, easier to recover?
Some programs on install need reboot, most do not. What is the implication when an
install demands a reboot to be effective?
Was your experience with W2K that it is:
a. more stable than W98SE
b. more resistant to software caused crashes than W98SE, easier to recover?
David wrote:
Whereabouts in Australia? I'm in Adelaide.
G'day David, I'm 20 km's east of Perth, W.A.
Al said:Mike, that sometimes means that the program installed a newer version
of a dll or ocx, and that Windows has to reboot to recognize the
change - or that a file that has to be replaced is currently open so,
again, Windows has to reboot for the old file to be replaced.
98SE wasn't particularly unstable, but 2k is particularly stable, so
maybe there's a little difference. (I know a 2k server that's run for
years between reboots.)
Depends on the cause of the crash. A really well-written (or
poorly-written, depending on your viewpoint) program can crash any OS.
Other possibles Mike.
missing MSCOREE
http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=missing+MSCOREE&btnG=Google+Search&meta=
How to uninstall the MSI installer
http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=How+to+uninstall+the+MSI+installer&btnG=Search&meta=
Howto uninstall the MSI installer
http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=Howto+uninstall+the+MSI+installer&btnG=Search&meta=
W2k is a predecessor to XP, which is super stable & W2k is lot more
stable than 98.
w2k system repair
http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=w2k+system+repair&btnG=Search&meta=
repair w2k
http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=repair+w2k&meta=
omega said:Signifies the app is dependent on the MSFT .NET framework ...
Al Klein said:98SE wasn't particularly unstable, but 2k is particularly stable, so
maybe there's a little difference. (I know a 2k server that's run for
years between reboots.)
Chris said:Microsoft says that 2k is forty times as reliable as 98SE.
ms said:Do you have a specific reference, I'd like to review it.
Mike Sa
Microsoft says that 2k is forty times as reliable as 98SE.
Al said:Microsoft also said that no one would EVER need more than 640k of RAM.
Take a MS pronouncement for whatever you think it's worth. Personally
I value the advice my dead cat gives me more highly than anything
coming out of Redmond - my cat can't tell me anything wrong.
Thanks, Craig. In a perfect world, pdf wouldn't exist.Craig said:Prolly this:
http://www.dis.wa.gov/enterprise/cab/win2kreliabilityreport.pdf
The same report is also available from MS directly..as an editable(!)
.doc file. Apart from the rare application install, the only Win2k
system I've /had/ to reboot since it's release is the one at home
running the (Steam) games.
fwiw,
-Craig
Thanks, Craig. In a perfect world, pdf wouldn't exist.
Al said:In a perfect world pdf would exist - Adobe wouldn't. Money wouldn't.
We'd all do what we were best at and get what we needed, die at a very
old age, completely healthy, vigorous and alert until the last moment,
when we'd simply go to sleep and not wake up.
Oh, wait a minute - someone tried something like that (the first part,
anyway) and it didn't work. I guess the world's not perfect after
all.