Only XP Professional supports 2 physically separate processors and
hyper-threading.
If it is working properly, with Hyper Threading enabled, then it *should*
look like there are 4 CPUs present - 2 logical (or virtual) CPUs for each
physical processor.
XP Home, on the other hand, does *not* support physically separate
processors. It does, however, support hyper-threading which creates 2
logical (or virtual) processors which share the workload. In such a case 2
identical logical processors will be seen.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I didn't think Xeon processors (which,
to my mind, can be thought of as a 64-bit P3 (yes, I'm well aware they're
not)) supported HyperThreading - I thought this was an invention Intel
dreamt up for the later P4s?
FYI, if you wish to use a dual CPU board you must have XP Pro. Home cannot
support 2 processors (of course, this doesn't apply to HT CPUs as that's one
processor masquerading as two).
And to clear my initial question up a little bit I was
referring to the P4 Xeon with HT enabled running XP Pro.
We run quite a few FPS gameing servers and have found XP
Pro to be the best performing OS for this purpose. I
have Win 2003 Server, but I really didn't want to use the
license for a game server, and I didn't want all of the
extra overhead from the services that were not required.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.