TM34451 said:
linked together meaning they share a relationship.
Say you have 6 tables total and 5 are linked together and then there
is one sitting all by itself with no relationship to any of the other
5 tables. Is this possible?
Oh, I see what you mean now. No, not all tables need to have
relationships with other tables. It depends on what those tables
represent. Probably it's most common for every table to be related to
at least one other table, just because that's what people do with
databases: model real-world entities and their relationships to other
entitites. Relational databases become more flexible and more powerful,
the more their tables and relationships represent the deep structure of
that part of the real world they are modelling -- and if you analyze
them thoroughly enough, most things in the real world are related to
other things. But if you ignore those entities and relationships that
aren't of interest to you, you can have a database table that has no
*defined and represented* relationship to any other table.