G
Guest
I need to create a table in Access database for storing daily and hourly
information on response rates per 399 transaction types.
Option 1 - This table would have 399 (J type transactions) x 24 (number of
hours per day) x 40 bytes (field size) = 383,040 bytes.
TRAN HH EX COUNT IO COUNT TOT RESP
J001 00 999999999 999999999 999999999
J001 01 999999999 999999999 999999999
J001 02 999999999 999999999 999999999
J002 00 999999999 999999999 999999999
J002 01 999999999 999999999 999999999
J002 03 999999999 999999999 999999999
Option 2 - Jamming all 24 hours into one record = 399 (J type transactions)
x 800 bytes (field size) = 319,200 bytes
TRAN HH EX COUNT IO COUNT TOT RESP HH EX COUNT IO COUNT TOT RESP
J001 00 999999999 999999999 999999999 01 999999999 999999999 999999999
For reporting purposes, Option 2 seems more appropriate. However, for
future data trending and statistical reporting, I am leaning more towards
Option 1.
I would like to get feedback from experts on which option is better.
information on response rates per 399 transaction types.
Option 1 - This table would have 399 (J type transactions) x 24 (number of
hours per day) x 40 bytes (field size) = 383,040 bytes.
TRAN HH EX COUNT IO COUNT TOT RESP
J001 00 999999999 999999999 999999999
J001 01 999999999 999999999 999999999
J001 02 999999999 999999999 999999999
J002 00 999999999 999999999 999999999
J002 01 999999999 999999999 999999999
J002 03 999999999 999999999 999999999
Option 2 - Jamming all 24 hours into one record = 399 (J type transactions)
x 800 bytes (field size) = 319,200 bytes
TRAN HH EX COUNT IO COUNT TOT RESP HH EX COUNT IO COUNT TOT RESP
J001 00 999999999 999999999 999999999 01 999999999 999999999 999999999
For reporting purposes, Option 2 seems more appropriate. However, for
future data trending and statistical reporting, I am leaning more towards
Option 1.
I would like to get feedback from experts on which option is better.