Defragmentation Utility

  • Thread starter Thread starter harleyguy2004
  • Start date Start date
H

harleyguy2004

Doing some comparison shopping.
What are some of the improvements to the defragmentation
utility with Windows XP? What are it's limitations? Thank
You
 
It's ok, but slow. Norton's is better. Diskkeeper is the fastest, and does
a good job.

Bill Crocker
 
… and (Diskkeeper) constantly runs in background (unless disabled).
Windows Defrag is OK. Why pay extra?

How to optimize Windows XP, 2000, ME
for the best performance (Step-by-step Visual Guide):
http://www.fixyourwindows.com
 
Bill said:
It's ok, but slow. Norton's is better. Diskkeeper is the fastest, and does
a good job.

Bill Crocker
i prefer O&O in stealth mode
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

Problem in defragmentation 2
Disk Defragmenter Help 8
my defrag won't work 1
Defragmenter won't run: "Access is Denied" 26
cannot open mmc 5
Disk Defragmenter Stalls 9
Disk Defragmenter 3
Defragmentation? 1

Back
Top