O
opticreep
I've always been a little confused by how resources are allocated in an
Windows operating system. Maybe someone could clear things up for
me...
Would a huge high-res desktop wallpaper on Windows XP use up more CPU
resources than a blank desktop? Or would it just use up more RAM (but
not CPU time)?
A fancy Windows XP desktop theme, with fancy skins, high-res
wallpapers, calendars, clocks, and all sorts of pretty things in the
desktop... would they still take up RAM and CPU resources when I'm
running a program (ie games like Doom3, compilers, etc)? Or will the
operating system essentially "suspend" the resources being allocated to
the desktop themes?
A program running in the background (peer-to-peer network) usually uses
up negligible CPU power... at least according to task manager.
Assuming I have loads of RAM to cover my bases, does a peer-to-peer
program in the background have practically no effect on system
performance?
TIA
Windows operating system. Maybe someone could clear things up for
me...
Would a huge high-res desktop wallpaper on Windows XP use up more CPU
resources than a blank desktop? Or would it just use up more RAM (but
not CPU time)?
A fancy Windows XP desktop theme, with fancy skins, high-res
wallpapers, calendars, clocks, and all sorts of pretty things in the
desktop... would they still take up RAM and CPU resources when I'm
running a program (ie games like Doom3, compilers, etc)? Or will the
operating system essentially "suspend" the resources being allocated to
the desktop themes?
A program running in the background (peer-to-peer network) usually uses
up negligible CPU power... at least according to task manager.
Assuming I have loads of RAM to cover my bases, does a peer-to-peer
program in the background have practically no effect on system
performance?
TIA