COMP.OS.LINUX.ADVOCACY Newcomer FAQ and Primer

R

Roy.Schavedmenutz

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ +
+ C.O.L.A. Newcomer FAQ and Primer +
+ Edition: 21 - 9/24/06 +
+ Group: comp.os.linux.advocacy +
+ +
+ Copyright (c) 2002-2006 Linux Reality Team +
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Welcome to comp.os.linux.advocacy, otherwise known as cola. This
FAQ will try to address most of the issues regarding Linux and
this group. Unlike the other FAQs, this one will try to be as
realistic as possible. If you want the straight information from
real people, continue reading. If you would like to be told what
you want to hear, or read a bunch of misinformation that you will
regret later as you find things don't work as they should, feel free
to read one of the other "FAQS" in here.

OK, on to the info! ADDED NEW SECTION BELOW!

Here's a list of some frequently asked and answered question here
and elsewhere that you may find useful in your quest to try linux.
Read these carefully before you decide to invest time in Linux, you
may find that you have better things you can do instead.

SECTION ONE - INSTALLATION
--------------------------

1.1 Q: I heard linux was easy to install, is it?
A: That depends on what distro you try. Most of them will have
trouble detecting all your hardware. Most new hardware devices
are not supported. If your lucky you might be able to find
something that someone threw together on the net. But that's
after spending a couple hours searching and probably won't take
advantage of your hardware to it's fullest capability.

1.2 Q: Once I get it installed, then what?
A: Then you get the joy of making sure everything is configured
right. Plan on a minimum of two hours per device to get it to
work. That's if the device is even supported.

1.3 Q: What happens if I'm in the middle of an install and the
installation freezes or just stops?
A: You get to reboot and start all over again. :) This happens
every so often with Linux. It seems like it's buggy install
routines or something. Ain't Linux grand? :)

1.4 Q: What's the deal?! I installed Linux and it took up almost 2GB
hard drive space!
A: The Linux distros usually install a LOT of never-used programs
on the default install. You can pick and choose what you want,
but good luck figuring out what programs are needed and what is
useless, obscure tools. Linux usually installs stuff like 10
different editors, 12 different mail clients, and so on.

(more to come...)

SECTION TWO - CONFIGURATION
---------------------------

2.1 Q: What's with all these cryptic files?
A: All of Linux is configured with cryptic text files. Some of
the more user-friendly distros have configuration utilities
that claim to do it for you, but success with these works
sometimes and other times don't, so sometimes you have to
edit them by hand. With Linux's spotty reliability in UI
programming, you might as well get used to it.

2.2 Q: What is killall, HUP, ls, cat, rm, which, etc and why are
these programs telling me to do them? Arggg!!
A: These are command line programs that do things within the
system. It's what makes Linux a powerful OS for those that
are experienced with it. But it's also what makes it a pain
in the arse to use and inefficient as a desktop system. Who
wants to type all the time when they can just click?!

(more to come...)

SECTION THREE - APPLICATIONS
----------------------------

3.1 Q: Where can I get some programs to run on linux?
A: Good question. Because Linux doesn't have a large user base
on the desktop,(I think it's about 0.24%, less than 1%)
companies that make software won't write their programs for
Linux. There's a lot of community created programs out there,
and some are fairly good, but those are few and far between.
Most of the Linux software that tries to mimic it's windows
counterpart is substandard. It's usually slow and buggy and
early in development.

3.2 Q: I tried to install an RPM but I got 'failed dependencies', what
is that?
A: That's Linux's version of DLL hell. Different versions and
distros use different libraries. So unlike windows where
programs will run on many different versions, Linux programs
will fail if they're not made for your specific version.

3.3 Q: What is compiling and configure, make and make install? And
what is a makefile?
A: This is a way to build the programs from the source code
under Linux. When the question above fails, you can always
build it yourself. The advantage is that it works most of
the time. The disadvantage is that it takes forever to build
large programs, you need to know some cryptic commands and
you have to do all this on a command line. Unlike Windows
where you just double click and you are done.

3.4 Q: Can I go to my local store to buy any Linux applications?
A: Not really. You can buy Linux itself at various stores. But
not too many commercial companies make applications for Linux,
there's no profit in it with 0.24% of the desktop market.

(more to come...)

SECTION FOUR - SPEED ISSUES
---------------------------

4.1 Q: Why is Linux so slow?
A: Linux is built on the technology of the old UNIX OS's. Even
the graphical user interface of Linux is a separate program
that
is the same type they used back in the older UNIX days. So
working with old technology will give you the old technology
responsiveness. Also, a lot of the GUI's, although nice to look
at, are still not mature. Using them is slow and sluggish
compared to, say, Windows.

(more to come...)

SECTION FIVE - CONSISTENCY
--------------------------

5.1 Q: Why are the windows different looking?
A: Since Linux isn't built by one company, group or have any
governing body, programs and interfaces can vary dramatically.
You can have everything from the nice look of KDE, to something
as ugly as TK and everything in between. You'll usually see
some
varying UI stile in Linux.

5.2 Q: Should I buy Suse Linux?
A: No. They make it difficult to get it for free. All the other
distros provide free ISO's to download. Suse is the only one
that doesn't provide them but instead has a FTP install that's
hard to get to work. Why should they make it easy? The more
people that can't get the download to work have to spend $80
or more for the boxed set. And on top of all that although
it might have a few more user friendly tools, it's still the
same base Linux system that's in development and that all the
other distros are using. In other words, they're all on about
the same level of struggling to catch up to Windows, so you're
not going to find any earth-shattering features in one compared
to another.

(more to come...)

SECTION SIX - LINUX COMMUNITY
-----------------------------

6.1 Q: What is RTFM?!
A: This is an acronym for Read The Fuc*ing Manual. This is a
common
answer you'll get when asking for help in the Linux community.
It's meant to make you feel inadequate while boating the Linux
persons ego at the same time. See, Linux enthusiasts consider
themselves to be guru like and above helping out the simple
newbie. You have to earn your respect by spending countless
hours becoming a kernel hacker before you're worthy of getting
any help.

6.2 Q: Why does everyone think they are better than you when using
Linux?
A: Same as above. When people use Linux they believe since it
takes
a little more knowledge to use Linux, they are technically
superior,
and see themselves as an elite group that doesn't have time for
the
pathetic little Windows people.

(more to come...)

SECTION SEVEN - LINUX ADVOCACY, HELPING OR HURTING?
---------------------------------------------------

7.1 Q: Everyone in here says linux is perfect, why would they say that
if it isn't?
A: We really don't know. Maybe they've used Linux so long that
they've gotten used to it. Some of these people haven't used
Windows in years so they are comparing Linux to the last
windows
they used, maybe Windows 3.1 or 95.

7.2 Q: Why does everyone call you a troll when you ask something that
questions linux?
A: Most of the people here in C.O.L.A. think of Linux more like a
religion than an OS. They mostly are MS haters and feel that
Linux is the greatest thing to ever hit computing. So when
someone questions Linux it's like questioning their belief
system. Instead of looking at it with some logic and
reasonable
judgment, they will lash out at you can't claim your are a
troll
or a paid MS supporter.

7.3 Q: Why does everyone <PLONK> you if you question Linux?
A: Fairly similar to above, Linux advocates can not argue their
point rationally. So to make it look like you are under them
or
you are not worth it, and at the same time find an easy way out
of having to prove themselves, they will <PLONK> you.

(more to come...)
SECTION EIGHT - LINUX EVANGELISM, ZEALOTS
-----------------------------------------

8.1 Q: There are some people that call this FAQ lies and seem to treat
it like it's a conspiracy against them, and post all sorts of links
to anti-microsoft articles. Why are they reacting so strongly?
A: The people that are reacting so strongly are most likely the
Linux extremists that believe everything negitive that is said about
Linux comes from Microsoft. Like many cult-like groups, the people
that belong to them don't have the ability to see things rationally
or outside of their view. If someone replies to the FAQ, or
anything questioning a non-favorable view on Linux, that seems a
little
"over the edge", do a google search on the person
(http://groups.google.com/) and look at his/her posting history
then decide for yourself if the person is credible or not.

(more to come...)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

A Little About Me:

What Others on digg.com think of me:

http://tinyurl.com/ysrz8u

http://tinyurl.com/ysrz8u
 
7

7

Asstroturfer (e-mail address removed) wrote on behalf of micoshaft
corporation:

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ +
+ Micoshaft Pista Newcomer FAQ and Primer +
+ Edition: 21 - 9/24/06 +
+ Group: Pista Intallees +
+ +
+ Copyright (c) 2007 Pista Removal Reality Team +
+ Sponsored by Micoshaft Corporation +
+ Released Under GPL 3 License +
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Welcome to the Windopz De-Pistification FAQette.

WoW that was a mouthful wasn't it boys and girls?!

Let me explain:

You bought vista crap from our sponsor micoshaft corporation
and you realize after hours of reboots and re-installs
that our sponsor micoshaft has taken the piss out of you. So you
decide that Pista is not for you. Now you want to de-install Pista
but expee takes up even more hours and all your driver
diskettes are mislaid/lost and application cds are fscked
because your dog has been shagging it for some time, etc, etc, etc.
Oh Smuck is me you cry out in vain as your PC craps out on you
leaving you with nothing despite you having paid loads of money.

Then light at the end of the tunnel appears in the form
of Linux. Now you get angry and use Linux in anger to recover
you data. RAAAAARRRrrrr... you growl through into the night
recovering data, learning GNU/Linux and by midnight all your
work is done, your computers are working, you learned many
things and Linux with Beryl is the king. You can sleep in peace
knowing Linux is your friend and share your dreams
with others...

Get Linux here...
http://www.livecdlist.com
http://www.distrowatch.com

For Beryl, downloaded latest beta release
of Ubuntu (Feisty Fawn)...
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/feisty/herd-3/

Install Beryl using the 3 click guide which links from here...
http://wiki.beryl-project.org/wiki/Install_Beryl_on_Ubuntu

And so WoW, after 3 clicks, you have Beryl up and running on your PC!!!

All that remains is now for you to stick the De-Pistification
Inventory label on your PC to complete the job...

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ +
+ Windopz De-Pistified PC +
+ OS: Ubuntu + Beryl +
+ Edition: 21 - 9/24/06 +
+ SN: 69 68 69 96 69 +
+ +
+ Copyright (c) 2006 Pista Removal Reality Team +
+ Released Under GPL 3 License +
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Be sure to come back for more in the next installation
of Micoshaft Pista Removal FAQ and Primer - Edition 22.
 
H

Hans Schneider

7 said:
Asstroturfer (e-mail address removed) wrote on behalf of micoshaft
corporation:


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ +
+ Micoshaft Pista Newcomer FAQ and Primer +
+ Edition: 21 - 9/24/06 +
+ Group: Pista Intallees +
+ +
+ Copyright (c) 2007 Pista Removal Reality Team +
+ Sponsored by Micoshaft Corporation +
+ Released Under GPL 3 License +
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Welcome to the Windopz De-Pistification FAQette.

You are less funny every time you post. And foul mouthing too.
 
D

dgk

Asstroturfer (e-mail address removed) wrote on behalf of micoshaft
corporation:


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ +
+ Micoshaft Pista Newcomer FAQ and Primer +
+ Edition: 21 - 9/24/06 +
+ Group: Pista Intallees +
+ +
+ Copyright (c) 2007 Pista Removal Reality Team +
+ Sponsored by Micoshaft Corporation +
+ Released Under GPL 3 License +
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Welcome to the Windopz De-Pistification FAQette.

WoW that was a mouthful wasn't it boys and girls?!

Let me explain:

You bought vista crap from our sponsor micoshaft corporation
and you realize after hours of reboots and re-installs
that our sponsor micoshaft has taken the piss out of you. So you
decide that Pista is not for you. Now you want to de-install Pista
....

Actually I installed Ubuntu before I've gotten around to installing
Vista. I had a spare PC doing nothing and it certainly doesn't meet
the minimum requirements for a decent Vista experience. Having read
the thread about 20 installs of Linux and no success I figured that
I'd give it a try. That's another story, there were several hiccups
along the way but I do have it running and it seems to be ok though I
have a lot more looking to do (and of course not much time).

My question is more about Beryl. When you talk about installing Linux,
you have to pick which variety first, and each has advocates and
detractors. A few years back I tried Suse (?) for example and
discarded it. In fact, that's the machine that's now running Ubuntu.

But now I have to pick a desktop as well. Ubuntu defaults, I believe,
to Gnome. Then there is KDE. Now there appears to be another choice in
this Beryl?

Why should I pick one over another? Does Beryl mean that folks have
decided that neither Gnome or KDE, open source or not, won't fit their
needs?

I think one of the major problems with Linux is that there is no
Linux. There are splinters all over the place, and while some choice
is a good thing, perhaps having too many choices is not.
 
H

Hadron Quark

dgk said:
...

Actually I installed Ubuntu before I've gotten around to installing
Vista. I had a spare PC doing nothing and it certainly doesn't meet
the minimum requirements for a decent Vista experience. Having read
the thread about 20 installs of Linux and no success I figured that
I'd give it a try. That's another story, there were several hiccups
along the way but I do have it running and it seems to be ok though I
have a lot more looking to do (and of course not much time).

My question is more about Beryl. When you talk about installing Linux,
you have to pick which variety first, and each has advocates and
detractors. A few years back I tried Suse (?) for example and
discarded it. In fact, that's the machine that's now running Ubuntu.

But now I have to pick a desktop as well. Ubuntu defaults, I believe,
to Gnome. Then there is KDE. Now there appears to be another choice in
this Beryl?

Why should I pick one over another? Does Beryl mean that folks have
decided that neither Gnome or KDE, open source or not, won't fit their
needs?

I think one of the major problems with Linux is that there is no
Linux. There are splinters all over the place, and while some choice
is a good thing, perhaps having too many choices is not.

hear hear.

No one in the group will tell you anything about gnome/kde/beryl as they
don't know. Everything is sunny.

You could try this for more info than you will find in this NG:

http://www.beryl-the-gnome.co.uk/

Trust me, installing a KDE app in Gnome is *asking* for trouble. In
gnome you get used to double clicking, in KDE its single click. When you
double click in a KDE admin app on gnome prepare yourself for the worst.
 
D

dgk

....

hear hear.

No one in the group will tell you anything about gnome/kde/beryl as they
don't know. Everything is sunny.

You could try this for more info than you will find in this NG:

http://www.beryl-the-gnome.co.uk/

Trust me, installing a KDE app in Gnome is *asking* for trouble. In
gnome you get used to double clicking, in KDE its single click. When you
double click in a KDE admin app on gnome prepare yourself for the worst.

Thanks. I really understand so little about Linux that I need to ask
about how running a KDE app in Gnome is asking for trouble. As a
programmer, if I write an app using maybe MySQL in something like
Gambas, do I target it for a particular version of Linux, or a
particular desktop? Or worse, do I have to worry about both? What
makes something a KDE app or a Gnome app, or I suppose a Beryl app?
 
G

Guest

Hadron Quark wrote:

Trust me, installing a KDE app in Gnome is *asking* for trouble. In
gnome you get used to double clicking, in KDE its single click. When you
double click in a KDE admin app on gnome prepare yourself for the worst.

And again Hadron Quark, "true linux advocate" and "kernel hacker" shows that
he does not have the slightest clue what he is blubbering about

Tell us, Oh Incredibly Stupid One, where do you "double click" *in* an
application? In /any/ application, be it windows, OS/2, OSX, KDE, Gnome?
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top