- Joined
- Mar 16, 2002
- Messages
- 6,643
- Reaction score
- 566
Time flies but at my age everything seems to be going at warp speed! Looking back, a decade ago I had bought the first digital camera not as a replacement of my Nikon film SLR but more of a secondary camera. I was interested in a camera that could do what my SLR could do, not exactly but close enough in flexibility.
The digital camera I chose back then had a lens with zoom range of 38-152 mm, shutter speed of 8 sec -1/2300 + bulb, pop-up flash range of 10m (32.8ft), customizable white balance, high resolution glass optics, extreme macro range from 2 cm to infinity, spot and matrix metering, full manual mode as well as Aperture priority, shutter priority and program modes. Fast lens F2.6 – 5.1. Even by todays standards these specs are not at all bad for a point and shoot camera. The camera in question is the Nikon Coolpix 995. If you just add a 14 MP sensor to above would you buy one? I am sure you would! However, the Nikon Cool pix 995 had just 3.2 MP sensor. One is compelled to think it is not even comparable to a phone with a built in camera. Nowadays you get free phones with 3.2 MP cameras built-in.
This is what the camera looks like (photo courtesy DP Review)
Last week I was cleaning up and checking stored items, that is when I spotted the Nikon camera bag, originally a black one but now giving more of a grayish look due to dust. I opened the bag and took out the camera which still looked great, I could not turn it on as the batteries were completely drained and would not recharge. I decided to order a couple of rechargeable batteries which luckily were available. The batteries arrived on Wednesday and after charging them fired the camera, lo and behold the light and LCD panel lit up after about 5 years.
After setting the clock I tested the camera with a few shots and all looked good. The only issue was the storage cards. The starter card was a mere 16 MB which came with the camera and I had acquired another CF card at the same time which was a whopping 128 MB (I had paid $96 + tax for this measly storage card). With these cards it would be difficult to go on a shooting session outdoors without running out of space. Therefore , on Wednesday night I ordered the highest capacity card this camera could handle which is 2 GB (Fat 16 file system limitation). I paid a princely sum of $13.74 (including tax and overnight shipping for this card! It sounds like a joke, doesn't it?
I was very curious about the picture quality of this camera compared to my Motorola Cliq 2 having a 5 MP camera which I acquired recently. I took a picture of the view from my front door, the first picture is from the Nikon and the second one from the Motorola. Both cameras were on full auto mode and I did not manipulate the images in any way. I chose this picture because it had shadows as well as highlights, secondly it was taken on a bright day where auto exposure on most cameras work very similarly. Take a look at each picture by zooming in on the blue street name plate across the street and the story would be revealed to you as to which image is better. I would not be surprised if YOU were surprised.
Here are the images of both the Motorola phone and Nikon camera taken from close range on macro mode.
Nikon 995 had a cult following, this camera was the most sought after one by coin and stamp collectors because of its tremendous macro capabilities. It was also a very desirable camera for the astro- photographers due to its 28mm thread on the optics, 28 mm being standard for all telescopes thus this camera could be attached to a telescope and you have all the galaxies literally at hand shaking distance away. Some astro-photographers are still using this camera for the same purpose. Last but not least, this camera was an excellent tool when it came to slide copying. I had bought the slide copier and used it many times to copy Slides done on my Nikon SLR. Here is one picture which I copied using the slide copier.
I am no astro-photographer nor a stamp or coin collector but I did have a few coins in my pocket so I took a few shots to see the results. The first one is a picture of three coins and from left to right, a dime, nickel and a quarter. I arranged the lighting in a way to emphasize the engraving on each coin to give a 3D effect.
For those who are not really aware of the size of a dime I took this picture by incorporating the standard USB plug to give a sense of scale.
This is the picture of the dime which happens to be the smallest among the three pictured above. Again, the lightning is same but the shot was taken from a very close range somewhere between 2 and 3 cm. This picture gives a very good idea of how capable the camera is when it comes to macro photography.
Of all the pictures that I took from this camera, this happens to be my favourite. It is a crystal flower made to glow from the window light and underexposed by 4 stops or so to achieve the desired result.
In case you are interested in reading the review of the Nikon Coolpix 995 and want to see the full specification as it first appeared on DPReview back in May 2001, here is the link
The digital camera I chose back then had a lens with zoom range of 38-152 mm, shutter speed of 8 sec -1/2300 + bulb, pop-up flash range of 10m (32.8ft), customizable white balance, high resolution glass optics, extreme macro range from 2 cm to infinity, spot and matrix metering, full manual mode as well as Aperture priority, shutter priority and program modes. Fast lens F2.6 – 5.1. Even by todays standards these specs are not at all bad for a point and shoot camera. The camera in question is the Nikon Coolpix 995. If you just add a 14 MP sensor to above would you buy one? I am sure you would! However, the Nikon Cool pix 995 had just 3.2 MP sensor. One is compelled to think it is not even comparable to a phone with a built in camera. Nowadays you get free phones with 3.2 MP cameras built-in.
This is what the camera looks like (photo courtesy DP Review)
Last week I was cleaning up and checking stored items, that is when I spotted the Nikon camera bag, originally a black one but now giving more of a grayish look due to dust. I opened the bag and took out the camera which still looked great, I could not turn it on as the batteries were completely drained and would not recharge. I decided to order a couple of rechargeable batteries which luckily were available. The batteries arrived on Wednesday and after charging them fired the camera, lo and behold the light and LCD panel lit up after about 5 years.
After setting the clock I tested the camera with a few shots and all looked good. The only issue was the storage cards. The starter card was a mere 16 MB which came with the camera and I had acquired another CF card at the same time which was a whopping 128 MB (I had paid $96 + tax for this measly storage card). With these cards it would be difficult to go on a shooting session outdoors without running out of space. Therefore , on Wednesday night I ordered the highest capacity card this camera could handle which is 2 GB (Fat 16 file system limitation). I paid a princely sum of $13.74 (including tax and overnight shipping for this card! It sounds like a joke, doesn't it?
I was very curious about the picture quality of this camera compared to my Motorola Cliq 2 having a 5 MP camera which I acquired recently. I took a picture of the view from my front door, the first picture is from the Nikon and the second one from the Motorola. Both cameras were on full auto mode and I did not manipulate the images in any way. I chose this picture because it had shadows as well as highlights, secondly it was taken on a bright day where auto exposure on most cameras work very similarly. Take a look at each picture by zooming in on the blue street name plate across the street and the story would be revealed to you as to which image is better. I would not be surprised if YOU were surprised.
Here are the images of both the Motorola phone and Nikon camera taken from close range on macro mode.
Nikon 995 had a cult following, this camera was the most sought after one by coin and stamp collectors because of its tremendous macro capabilities. It was also a very desirable camera for the astro- photographers due to its 28mm thread on the optics, 28 mm being standard for all telescopes thus this camera could be attached to a telescope and you have all the galaxies literally at hand shaking distance away. Some astro-photographers are still using this camera for the same purpose. Last but not least, this camera was an excellent tool when it came to slide copying. I had bought the slide copier and used it many times to copy Slides done on my Nikon SLR. Here is one picture which I copied using the slide copier.
I am no astro-photographer nor a stamp or coin collector but I did have a few coins in my pocket so I took a few shots to see the results. The first one is a picture of three coins and from left to right, a dime, nickel and a quarter. I arranged the lighting in a way to emphasize the engraving on each coin to give a 3D effect.
For those who are not really aware of the size of a dime I took this picture by incorporating the standard USB plug to give a sense of scale.
This is the picture of the dime which happens to be the smallest among the three pictured above. Again, the lightning is same but the shot was taken from a very close range somewhere between 2 and 3 cm. This picture gives a very good idea of how capable the camera is when it comes to macro photography.
Of all the pictures that I took from this camera, this happens to be my favourite. It is a crystal flower made to glow from the window light and underexposed by 4 stops or so to achieve the desired result.
In case you are interested in reading the review of the Nikon Coolpix 995 and want to see the full specification as it first appeared on DPReview back in May 2001, here is the link
