Can Vista co-exists Media Ctr in one box?

G

Guest

I have MCE 2005 running in this box and I would like to test out Vista-Beta 2
Ultimate Edition, if the box can be dual-booted with it or will it overwrite
the same MBR files?

I tried searching on the other Newsgroup other categories, but I could not
get any suggestions. Pls answer back if you could.
 
A

Andre Da Costa [Extended64]

Yes, Vista Ultimate and XP Media Center Edition 2005 can co-exist in "dual
boot" configurations if Vista is installed on a "separate logical
partition". Its also recommended you launch setup from within XP and select
the dedicated partition, it just works better that way based on my
experiences. I am dual booting XP Professional x86, x64, Server 2003 x86,
x64, OS X x86 and Vista Ultimate x64 5384.
--
--
Andre
Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
 
N

Naseru

Wouldn't "multi-booting" be the correct expression for your multi-boot
setup? "dual-boot" inherently limits to 2 choices.

- naseru
 
N

Naseru

Yes, as per Andre's remark.

KEEP IN MIND: Vista Ultimate Edition includes MCE2005 options (as well as
TabletPC options, for the curious onlookers). My install has Media Center
configured (i have a tv tuner card), Tablet PC features configured (i have a
wacom tablet), and regular OS stuff.

- naseru
 
P

Peter

Andre, just noticed you said "separate logical partition"...not a primary
one?
I've set up a 35gb partition on my HD as a primary one in readiness for
Vista public beta...should I convert it to logical? Easy to do as I have
Partition Magic.
 
B

Bruce Chambers

Peter said:
Andre, just noticed you said "separate logical partition"...not a primary
one?
I've set up a 35gb partition on my HD as a primary one in readiness for
Vista public beta...should I convert it to logical? Easy to do as I have
Partition Magic.


It doesn't matter a great deal. With Microsoft operating systems,
there need be only one Primay partition. You would be allowed to have a
maximum of 4 partitions, all of which could be primary, if desired.
Normally, people create at least one Extended partiton (leaving a
maximum of 3 primary partitions) because it's possible to create a large
number - up to the maximum number allowed by the alphabet - of logical
drives within an extended partitions. A primary partition cannot be
sub-divided in this manner. The need for only one primary partition is
caused by the fact that only a primary partition can be flagged as
"Active" (bootable). Logical drives with an Extended partition cannot
be made bootable.

When dual- or multi-booting, there realy only needs to be the one
bootable partition, into which the boot manager is installed. The boot
manager can then hand off the loading of the OS to whichever partition
(primary or extended) holds the target OS.

For instance, I'm currently dual-booting WinXPx64 and Vista64. I have
two partitions on my hard drive: one primary partition and one extended
partition devided into two logical "drives." WinXPx64 resides on the
Primary (C:) partition, Vista64 resides on one of the logical drives
(D:) within the Extended partition, and the remaining logical drive
contains shared data.

Naturally, I had WinXPx64 installed initially. When I installed Vista,
I simply chose the custom installation to place the operating system
files onto the logical drive within the extended partition. Vista's
installation routine automatically placed a few necessary files on the
primary partition to create the dual-boot configuration, and placed the
rest of Vista on D:.

The only thing different (besides the BCD, of course) I've found about
dual-booting WinXP and Vista from earlier dual-boot combinations (i.e.,
Win2K & WinXP) is that each OS sees itself as residing on C: when I'm
booted into it. With earlier versions, the drive lettering remained static.


--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:



They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -Benjamin Franklin
 
B

Bruce Chambers

Peter said:
Thanks Bruce...I'll print that out! ;-)


You're welcome.

--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:



They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -Benjamin Franklin
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top