I'm currently using Access 97 and need to upgrade for many reasons, the most
important one is that I have about 15 people who need to add data to my
database at one time. Is Access 2003 better at handling multiple users than
Access 97?
What specific problems have you encountered with multiple users?
With proper database structure (a split database with each user having
their own frontend linked to a shared backend database containing the
tables), either version of the program should be perfectly capable of
handling multiple users. I don't think 2003 is any better than 97, but
I don't think it's any worse either - both are quite capable. The
specifications say that there is a limit or 255 concurrent users; in
practice, some thirty or so concurrent updating users, or well over a
hundred read-only users, should be feasible.
If you have multiple users sharing the same united database... well,
DON'T. It will NOT work well.
John W. Vinson[MVP]