burn in testing utility - what should i use?

R

raymond

can anyone recomend a good utility fro tesing a computer before it
goes into service??....i have been using passmark but it tends to
crash on some machines even though no errors are showing...
..i t needs to put a good amount of stress on all components especially
ram and hard disk
thanks..
 
K

kony

can anyone recomend a good utility fro tesing a computer before it
goes into service??....i have been using passmark but it tends to
crash on some machines even though no errors are showing...
.i t needs to put a good amount of stress on all components especially
ram and hard disk
thanks..

Ummm, did it not then suggest to you that the machine is even more
instable than if it'd generated an error?

Each component is best tested separately. For CPU, Prime95 Torture test,
"In-Place Large FFT" mode (with mem size increased 150% if/when CPU has >+
1MB cache), for several hours.

Memory, Memtest86

Graphics, 3DMark2001

Total thermal margin, 3DMark2001 and CPUBurn (set to normal priority)
concurrently.

There is no "all in one" test that will even come close to testing
stability reliably, including passmark. Each subsystem must be isolated
else no subsystem ever gets sustained peak utilization.

For hard drives, it's not so clear cut. Hard drives don't generally crash
but rather suffer longer term from heat stress.. In such a scenario
touch-testing the hard drive casing is easy enough if you don't have a way
to take an accurate temp reading. Run the manufacturer's diagnostics, one
of several disk scanners' read/write/verify the whole drive, and a general
throughput test to verify it's operating within expected parameters per
device and interface used.
 
J

JAD

I find them almost useless, MO, The only reason I use them, is to use
the speed report and seek/trans error report.
AFA 'burning in' to find weak components, 50/50 chance of identifying
it before it gets to the client. (Murphy's Law)
If it were a build for myself, I just jump in and start rendering
video or whatever it is I designed the Rig to do.
Just me.... Not sure if those test really are as 'safe' as they say, I
realize that your boarder lining the threshold
intentionally, but I wonder if the programmer is a little over the
top, as that is becoming a rapidly growing personality trait.
I always wondered about who or what 'stats' determine the amount of
'stress' that is applied and what type of stress.

Again MHO
 
W

w_tom

Review a previous discusson entitled what's "burn-in"?
starting 14 Mar 2004 in the newsgroup alt.computer .
 
S

Shep©

I find them almost useless, MO, The only reason I use them, is to use
the speed report and seek/trans error report.
AFA 'burning in' to find weak components, 50/50 chance of identifying
it before it gets to the client. (Murphy's Law)
If it were a build for myself, I just jump in and start rendering
video or whatever it is I designed the Rig to do.
Just me.... Not sure if those test really are as 'safe' as they say, I
realize that your boarder lining the threshold
intentionally, but I wonder if the programmer is a little over the
top, as that is becoming a rapidly growing personality trait.
I always wondered about who or what 'stats' determine the amount of
'stress' that is applied and what type of stress.

Again MHO

Ditto and don't get me started on software mem testers<grin> ;-)





--
Free Windows/PC help,
http://www.geocities.com/sheppola/trouble.html
email shepATpartyheld.de
Free songs to download and,"BURN" :O)
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/8/nomessiahsmusic.htm
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top